Open source advocates learning the hard way that no, you can’t turn microsoft into an ethical company from the inside out. The profit motive chews up and spits out anyone trying to do so.
The .NET people may win a few here and there, but they’re fighting a losing battle, and should just switch to better more open source platforms already.
Mmmm Lemmy using Java Servlet Pages…
JSP is under the Eclipse and GPL 2 with GNU CE licenses. In the other hand .NET is managed by the .NET Foundation, a Microsoft’s front entity to have the ecosystem and the “community” under its control. It de facto controls the patents and licenses (suspiciously MIT licenses) of .NET
I was telling that because of “should just switch to better more open source platforms already” even when Lemmy is written in rust and other langs.
Can we trust Microsoft? No.
No.
In my opinion, nope.
Yeah, open source needs to be community owned and community driven. Relying on corporations as the primary owners of open source platforms will ultimately lead to disaster. This is also the reason why Firefox is so important. While Chromium is technically an open source project, the reality is that Google makes all the important decisions regarding its direction. If Firefox folds then Google would become the de facto gatekeeper of the internet.
Exactly! @[email protected]
Mozilla IS sponsored by Google (Alphabet Inc, Nest). That is, gain money with user data. https://themarkup.org/blacklight?url=mozilla.org The lack is this, the bad habits of surveillance advertising as business system of the most US companies, FOSS or not.
The problem that ALL browser engines are from US companies (Gecko, Bing, WebKit) and with the same privacy problem in all browsers which they use them as is. Apart from the APIs from Google, Facebook, Amazon, which are also FOSS and which are used by a lot of developers in their products. Even a lot of webs don’t work or block the access to browsers without some of this APIs.
It is not the problem from where developers distribute their FOSS, be it from GitHub (from MS since 2018), Microsoft itself, Google or NASA, which also has an extensive catalog of FOSS, but the intentions of the developer of this product, the attention the product receives and from a community that can quickly detect security holes or malware infiltration, which is not given in many of the neglected FOSS that still circulate on the network.
Sponsored by Google isn’t the same as its development being driven by Google. The fact that Mozilla is a non-profit foundation is already a huge step up. The problem is that it takes a lot of resources to develop a browser, and Mozilla has been struggling to secure funding for a long time now. However, for all its flaws Firefox is the only serious alternative to Chrome and if Mozilla folds we’ll be living in a world where the web is owned by Google.
It is obviously a problem that the web is mainly shared between MS and Google. But I think that the underlying problem is not this or only in part. A company or a developer naturally also has to pay their bills to offer the necessary services, maintain an infrastructure and servers, among many other things. If he want to offer a free service or product, it is legitimate that he do so through sponsored links, generic advertisements, merchandising, offering premium content, donations or other similar measures, with which it is very well possible to get enough income.
But what these companies do is not this, but they traffic with the search histories and other data of the users, selling them to third parties, which makes it impossible to control what they do with this data, apart from displaying ads’ tailored 'and how they protect this datas.
This, apart from a violation of fundamental privacy rights, is also a big security risk. It is not the first time that hundreds of thousands of sensitive user data from Google, Facebook and others have been leaked, including banking and medical details.
If Mozilla uses these Google surveillance advertising techniques to earn money, it is no better than Google itself, which also offers much better services, which, apart from the other, is undoubtedly many of the services that do not even have an alternative to height of these (YouTube, Google Streetview, research, quantum techniques, satellites and much more). The problem is, what von Tetzchner says, they must go back to their ‘Don’t be evil’ motto that they have long forgotten.
A free network cannot be achieved by avoiding one and fostering another that also monitors and sells user data, but rather by ending this surveillance and censorship practiced by all large American companies.
I guess my question is what specifically Mozilla does that’s questionable. As far as I know, Firefox doesn’t force any surveillance or advertising on the users. Stuff like Pocket integration is questionable, but that’s easily disabled.
Right, but if you want to log out from the surveillance of Alphabet and Nest, you have to do this directly contacting with this companies, not in Mozilla itself. Meanwhile they have your data and it’s questionable if they really delete them, Google don’t do this inmediadly, include if you delete your history in their dashboard. It’s a very bad policy, yes or yes. Is sad that out there some closed source soft more private and respectfull to the user than some FOSS.
FOSS is a great system for developers, which allows free exchange and / or modification of products, but regarding privacy, security and continuity, in many cases they do not offer any special guarantee for a normal user.
Personally I prefer FOSS as much as possible, but for me the quality is more important and above all the TOS and PP conditions of the product. For me, as someone whose programming knowledge does not exceed the ‘Hello World’ in much, it is irrelevant that I can read the source code or not.
I still think that a free internet is not based only on FOSS, despising on principle the software of developers who do not use this system, but on ending censorship and surveillance on the net for mere commercial interests, this is what destroys freedom, by turning the network into a simple shopping center and FOSS as system of promotion for products, using the user as merchandise.
I’m a bit confused here, are you suggesting that Firefox sends telemetry to Google?
Only when they release all their software/technology/patents under FREE/LIBRE licenses.
So, in other words: never?
You can’t even trust Microsoft with their own operating system. They have never been trustworthy.
Sorry, but I fully trust Windows… in a VM.
With Networking disabled?
I wouldn’t like torturing my poor pc installing such crap in a VM :(
I sometimes (few times a year) use internet in my 8.1 VM, but never XP or 7.
Ha! No.
no.
I didn’t see MS embracing FOSS software. I don’t give a shit about they being “Open Source Lovers” bc being OpenSource changes nothing.
I think it is important to recognise that not only can we not trust microsoft to handle random open source matters.
IMO we have to consider the very real possibility that MS is actively working to slowly subvert if not destroy opensource - not only specific OSS implementations (eg. Linux). But also perhaps at a more fundamental and philosophical level too.
That certainly would be their method of operation historically.
Embrace, extend, extinguish.
Hell no
NO
No
Noup
