Examples could be things like specific configuration defaults or general decision-making in leadership.

What would you change?

  • umbrella@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    if i understand correctly the testing branch is similar to ubuntu non-lts?

        • sebsch@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Yes it runs quite stable. But the packages and their configuration can change.

          If you’re looking for something more conservative, the stable branch fits better but on a desktop it’s very old (like an Ubuntu lts)

          • umbrella@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            thats precisely my problem with debian stable, but id be ok with testing if it doesnt break unpredictably with regular updates.