• karlhungus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    10 months ago
    1. You are free to not spend money there
    2. If you took this logic and turned it around, i could see an argument saying the moment you stop helping society why should we let you exist

    I agree that in the best interests of having a pleasant place to live, or elected officials should force them to sell at not so great a profit. I feel like “they shouldn’t be allowed to exist” is a poor way to put it.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          Go and kill someone and get caught, tell me how that goes for ya 🙂

          Also, you’re in a Canadian community here.

          • karlhungus
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            besides the example i gave actually harming people, and them not being in prison, to go from “people who don’t help society” to murder is kind of a stretch isn’t it?

            you realize it’s possible to neither help nor harm society.

            i am canadian, are we limited to examples only of canadian’s who harm societies, C suite of loblaws isn’t in jail are they?