Alabama, unless stopped by the courts, intends to strap Kenneth Eugene Smith to a gurney Thursday and use a gas mask to replace breathable air with nitrogen, depriving him of oxygen, in the nation’s first execution attempt with the method.

The Alabama attorney general’s office told federal appeals court judges last week that nitrogen hypoxia is “the most painless and humane method of execution known to man.” But what exactly Smith, 58, will feel after the warden switches on the gas is unknown, some doctors and critics say.

“What effect the condemned person will feel from the nitrogen gas itself, no one knows,” Dr. Jeffrey Keller, president of the American College of Correctional Physicians, wrote in an email. “This has never been done before. It is an experimental procedure.”

Keller, who was not involved in developing the Alabama protocol, said the plan is to “eliminate all of the oxygen from the air” that Smith is breathing by replacing it with nitrogen.

  • wischi@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    11 months ago

    If it’s pure nitrogen it’s as painless as it can get. Make sure there is no O2 in there, get rid of exhaled CO2. Simple. But still, your country should think about death sentences in general. If you think nitrogen is too inhumane just shoot them im the head with a shotgun from a close distance, that too should do the trick.

    • capital@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      11 months ago

      As long as we continue to do this, we should be forced to pull “execution duty” like we can pull jury duty.

      Make people come in to press the button that kills the person.

      Let’s see how people vote concerning capital punishment after that.

      • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        I’d rather pay a professional sociopath a fraction of the cost it would take to jail the inmate for life, to push that button.

        • capital@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Maybe I’m misinterpreting but you don’t seem to have any concern for mistakes in the justice system that incorrectly convict people and subsequently kill them.

          Do I have that right?

          • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            No I do have that concern too.

            I simultaneously also think reprehensible criminals that have been proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt should still be executed.

            • capital@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              ?

              As if before now we didn’t think we were killing people we’d proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt?

              • astral_avocado@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                11 months ago

                I doubt the courts actually did that in the majority of those cases. There could be something said about the criteria used for who’s eligible for execution.

                For example some good candidates would be any number of mass shooters still alive in max security prison. These people have dozens of witnesses and security cam footage, and are beyond a reasonable doubt guilty and should be offed.