• Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    109
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    No one provided any explantion for their vote.

    USA, the country where everything’s made up and the legal justifications don’t matter.

  • reddig33@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    10 months ago

    From NBC:

    “The brief order noted that four conservative members of the nine-justice court would have rejected the government’s request. They were Justice Clarence Thomas, Justice Samuel Alito, Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Brett Kavanaugh.”

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      10 months ago

      This is literally settled shit since the Civil War. They’re trying to bring back state law supremacy. Which led to… The fucking civil war.

            • PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              If the rebels in question include several state governments then they may indeed be nuclear capable.

              • El Barto@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                I don’t think they can just turn on them bombs without some sort of electronic approval from the feds.

                • PRUSSIA_x86@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  They require presidential authority to launch, but the physical operation of the weapons themselves is wholly independent. This allows for things like retaliatory strikes in case leadership is killed or can’t be reached immediately following an attack. This also makes them vulnerable however, if the people overseeing these weapons and the states they’re housed in become compromised by extremist ideologies.

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      The SCOTUS has been filled with scumbags since day one, very seriously. They literally caused the civil war and prolonged the great depression. They also gutted the 13th and 14th amendments while deciding that people are militias.

    • frezik@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      It’s an institution that only exists because the other two branches listen. It doesn’t have an army or a police force. Even the Marshals technically operate under the Executive branch. If the Legislature and Executive branches both decided to ignore them, then Roberts could whine a bunch, but nothing would happen.

      It’s there because of respect built over two centuries and then some. They seem determined to throw it away.

      • Nah the litigants can apply to lower courts for affirmative relief in compliance with the higher court’s orders and the judges can issues writs of mandamus to any proper officer requiring the officer to do a thing, the failure of which is remedied by a writ of capias, which is a judicial arrest warrant. Would have to be a whole hell of a lot of local judges, cops, marshals, lawyers, clerks, administrators, etc., who would have to ignore it, before nobody ends up in jail or has their assets seized.

        • BigWheelPowerBrakeSlider@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 months ago

          Yeah but if the legislative branch doesn’t fund it and the executive branch doesn’t enforce it, then as my granpappy always said: “a writ ain’t worth a shit.” Lower courts, judges, lawyers, clerks, police, Marshalls, and even administrators notwithstanding.

      • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        We still let them decide what is and isn’t legal. I wish anyone cared that much about what I say.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 months ago

          Well they’re about to decide they get to set regulations, not agencies. So that’s going to be fun and not at all a giant overreach for power.

      • 𝕱𝖎𝖗𝖊𝖜𝖎𝖙𝖈𝖍@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        I propose we build a wall around the entirety of Texas and yeet it from the states. Then we can use any federal funds they were receiving to help people move in/out of Texas. They already have their own power grid, I’m sure it’ll be fine.

      • m-p{3}A
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        They wouldn’t be able to send their illegals to other states as easily if a wall is build around them tho.

        • GBU_28@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          How is that better? The point is people from Mexico are trying to get into the US, and but getting the services they need

          • Kbobabob@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Man, i got no idea what giving Texas away would solve. I was just pointing out what would happen.