Both of your comments should be deleted as they have nothing to do with the thread topic. I’m not really sure why you think you’re contributing anything of value here.
There’s nothing sus about trying different instances, only making a post on one, unless you’re a deeply paranoid person, for which I can only recommend therapy.
The National Review is not a ‘rag’, it’s a conservative magazine.
It’s not like this is a secret what’s happening at the DSA.
Removed by mod
wow, the lack of foresight on that comment is STUNNING
Both of your comments should be deleted as they have nothing to do with the thread topic. I’m not really sure why you think you’re contributing anything of value here.
Just like the article and your comments…
Does it upset you that the DSA is about to go bankrupt and that’s why you’re taking it out on people posting that this is in fact happening?
An article written by a right wing rag that could be factual about one of their political opponents shared by someone who is sus.
Are you mad someone is calling your sus actions out?
There’s nothing sus about trying different instances, only making a post on one, unless you’re a deeply paranoid person, for which I can only recommend therapy.
The National Review is not a ‘rag’, it’s a conservative magazine.
It’s not like this is a secret what’s happening at the DSA.
https://dsa-lsc.org/2024/01/13/lsc-budget-proposal/
No, there isn’t anything sus about trying out different instances. There is however looking at your actions and the calling them sus…
You really shouldn’t try to diagnose people, either.