• VonCesaw@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Acting violent to those you find mildly annoying is an actual disorder (intermittent anger disorder), I’d get it checked out before you end up doing time my brother

    • PopMyCop@iusearchlinux.fyi
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I don’t know, mate. I think shoving children out of the way as a fully grown adult is a little bit more than “mildly annoying.” One of the standards I have for someone to be ‘mature’ is being able to control themselves when appropriate. Your glee to see a mickey is not an appropriate time to physically assault children.

        • HikingVet
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          The person is a bully and the only thing that stops bullies is immediate consequences of their actions

          • VonCesaw@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            ‘Consequences of their actions’ would be removal from the park and subsequent ban, not having to go to court to sue the person who assaulted them for injuries and damages

            • HikingVet
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              I’ll settle for them getting dinged for violent threats before they are allowed around children.

              • VonCesaw@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                9 months ago

                It would honestly affect them more if they were banned from the park, that is the scariest thing in the world to them

                • HikingVet
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I would bet that charges for terroristic threats or threats to minors would have more long reaching effects.

    • HikingVet
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      I’ll take the hate on what I said. People saying they are going to push kids are in my experience more likely to cause harm then me wanting them to face consequences

      And unless you have a degree realted to mental health, I don’t need your armchair diagnosis of misreading of my comment.

        • HikingVet
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          Either way, wishing consequences isn’t “acting violent”.

          • VonCesaw@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            Responding to simple assault that doesn’t involve you with assault and battery IS acting violent

              • VonCesaw@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                99% sure that ‘others’ would prefer it be done by somebody that is trained, officiated, and legally responsible for their actions rather than watch some self-proclaimed vigilante justice dealer attack someone else

                • HikingVet
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  I see you decrying all I’ve said, but you’ve yet to address the fact that she said she was gonna push kids. So, give me a reason why I shouldn’t want her to face consequences? And calling the cops is inviting lethal force into the mix.

                  • VonCesaw@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    9 months ago

                    Disney has security guards. Disney has security cameras. Disney has jurisdiction to have people removed from the park. Disney has the right to have people charged with crimes they committed (with evidence from previously mentioned guards and cameras). Disney does not need people to do their job for them, they can literally handle it themselves.