cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ca/post/12981758

With apologies for the colour scheme (I’m so sorry if you’re colour blind!). This is the lower layer of a two layer 1D inversion model, interpolated. Was playing with maximizing the contrast to try to find the foundation of the Richardson Mansion that existed on this property prior to it being bulldozed in the 70s and donated to the City of Winnipeg to become Munson Park. I’m pretty sure I captured it in the red square in the middle.

  • TroyOPM
    21·
    6 months ago

    Well, pretty close :)

    This is an electromagnetic scanner. It’s basically a magnetic coil that you pass electricity through, this generates a magnetic field in the earth directly beneath the scanner (about 1m around the device). If the earth is electrically conductive or resistive, it responds differently. Add a GPS and walk around with it… $40k soil mapper that you carry about to make a map and it doesn’t even touch the ground.

    I knew the foundation would be there because I went to The Nutcracker at the Royal Winnipeg Ballet this Christmas. Before the show, they had a big curtain over the stage with a picture of a giant mansion on it. During the introduction, the director gave a tiny history lesson, saying that this mansion formed the basis of the backdrop they used for the ballet, and that it was a real place, and that place is now Munson Park. A little googling later, and it turns out that this was the Richardson family mansion until the 1970s when it was bulldozed and donated to the city to create the park. The Richardson family also sponsors the ballet. I was just sort of closing the loop for my own interest :)

    I’ve previously reached out to the parks branch within the city about testing toys. They’ve given me tacit approval so long as I’m not disturbing anyone.

    I thought it would be locally interesting to people in Winnipeg ;)

    • pirating@lemmy.world
      3·
      6 months ago

      This sounds like something I would love to try! How did you build the scanner, and then… Well build a map from it? I’m now realizing how little I know about this lol.

      • TroyOPM
        7·
        6 months ago

        I didn’t build this scanner – this one was made in Toronto by a company called Geonics. But I’ve made similar equipment. This one operates at 14.5kHz, which is conveniently inside the human audio frequency range, so you can use off the shelf audio system components to cobble a similar system together. However, getting it right (calibrations and such) is the tricky part. Half the reason I was collecting this test data was to verify that I could use the instrument (we just bought it), and that the calibrations were sane.

        It streams data out over a Bluetooth serial port. So it’s pretty easy to log it actually. We use a windows program on a field ruggedized table – it logs the raw data with timestamp and GPS position. But I could write a python script to do it, so the software isn’t that advanced :)

        Later I pull it into QGIS (open source and pretty amazing), and make a heat map. The background imagery is pulled from Google Earth.

        Geophysical equipment tends to be quite simple but also quite expensive. It costs a lot to make them – they’re mostly hand built. And they don’t sell in high volume, so to recoup your R&D costs, you set the price much higher than the components would dictate. Total cost of components in this unit would be something like $2k (excluding the tablet), but it sells for $30k. The manufacturer will be lucky to sell a half dozen globally each year, so most of the cost is in the salary of the technicians and engineers manually building them.

        Going back to the audio components analogy – imagine them as high end guitars and amplifiers, hand assembled. Hell, much of the unit I used here is actually made out of wood (for it’s thermal properties, and electrical resistance).

        Blurry photo of the unit from my testing. Weighs about the same as a guitar. And a bunch of dials on top too… ;)