• antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I do have to admit it’s a bit disheartening to post that pic, and then people react to it by looking how to use the objects to ‘hack’ the nature of reality.

    • Isoprenoid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      106
      ·
      1 year ago

      OP: “Hey, guys! Here are some objects that hack the nature of reality.”

      Posters: *Uses them to further hack the nature of reality, just in other ways*

      OP:

      • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 year ago

        Kind of, lol. But you can see the difference in the type of hacking. The objects are only meant to hack your own, private reality. That’s what the picture is meant to address, that aspect of our lives that can’t be translated into external and/or mechanical utility.

        Besides, the issue of energy scarcity that the replies are working off could be fixed or at least minimised through realistic technological and political/economic solutions, with no need for magical objects that defy the laws of physics. But no law or real invention can be guaranteed e.g. to give you good dreams.

    • DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean, that magic candle single handedly gives hope for reversing universal entropy. Everything else might be personally fulfilling but that thing could be the key to preventing the heat death of the universe.

      Which would be pretty personally fulfilling too imo.

    • HatchetHaro@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 year ago

      mein freund, some of us prefer to focus on extracting the most material value out of these hypothetical objects, simply because we want to. it’s fun to imagine the possibilities with the infinite energy from the candle and the mug.

      • VikingHippie@lemmy.wtf
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        material value

        I think that’s the point that they’re making: it’s supposed to be about which object of immense EMOTIONAL value would make people the happiest, and then a lot of people make it about their material value in stead.

        As much as I understand their disappointment, though, Lemmy of all places is so full of nerds and geeks (said with love as a geek myself) who know a lot about technical stuff that it was pretty much bound to happen…

        • antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yes, thank you :D (I mean, of course I’m exaggerating a bit by claiming I’m disappointed, it’s more of a… “conceptual” disappointment)

        • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think infinite energy would create muuuch more happiness for so many more people. But i direct happiness cheats are easier to understand i guess.

    • variants@possumpat.io
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      That was my realization when I invited people to my minecraft server and saw people dig a whole and breed cows just to kill them for xp, while I was over there giving them grass and water and a nice fence