These laws will ban rewards for spending money within a game for the first time, ban rewards for buying consecutive microtransactions, and ban rewards for daily log-ins.

  • Th4tGuyII@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    136
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I would’ve expected to see something like thus out of the EU rather than China, but at least somebody’s making the first move against the predatory monetisation of apps

    • Ahri Boy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      If China’s plan is successful, other countries will follow suit.

      PS: RIP my free intertwined fates in Gaming (Jiaming) Impact.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The Chinese government has started it‘s witch hunt against video games years ago and we have yet to see any of their draconic laws being enforced. It looks like they made them just so they can cherry pick and suppress whoever disagrees with them one way or another. This will be no exception. Gambling, prostitution and porn are all illegal in mainland China but it has always been a huge and open business in every part of the country.

    • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What’s predatory about this? This seems like the least forced purchase in the world – absolutely nobody needs the things they’re selling. They are like a definition of a luxury item.

      • Aasikki@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Predatory as in they literally employ psychologists to help design them to be as addictive as they can be, then they market it towards kids or at the very least don’t really do anything to prevent kids from gambling in them (yeah it’s also partially a parenting issue but can’t really expect all parents to be tech savvy enough to understand all everything about gaming).

        Then there’s the other sucky, but just not sucky enough for it to be an illegal side of things: games that these mechanics suck ass and we are getting less and less objectively good games because more and more games seek to make some quick buck by making their games casinos of sorts.

        It’s only as luxurious as being addicted to cocaine in hopes that the next line will hit like the first one, or in game terms, hoping that the next loot box gets you the skin/character/whatever you wanted and releases that quick dopamine rush. Rinse and repeat.

        • fosforus@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the comparison to cocaine is apt. Therefore I find it increasingly odd how parents purchase their children cocaine-delivery mechanisms, and how society deems all this completely legal.

    • woelkchen@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s so destructive that even China doesn’t like it

      They probably love that it’s hurting competing nations, though.

    • cannache@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      41
      ·
      1 year ago

      Even Big China man no happy with your business Mr Wei-song, what should we do?

      “Tell him to fuck himself”

      • Synthuir@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        To add onto what the others have said, the CCP isn’t shy about enforcing restrictions on digital media domestically. For instance, TikTok in China (Douyin) is quite different from the international version with strictly-enforced time limits, content restrictions, etc.

        • undeffeined@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          If it was only money they wanted they would not do this. The limitations they are imposing will cut revenue to their biggest Game companies. I mean, the laws are not in effect and there was already a big crash on Netease and Tencent stock prices.

        • gataloca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think the CCP are just trying to do what they think is best for the welfare of their people.

      • Alsephina@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        China doing a better job regulating corporations than the west is nothing new.

        Even this current one happened while Tencent was barely recovering from another regulation set last year. Kicking megacorps while they’re down lol as they should.

        • yamanii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          But think about the CEO’s freedom of abusing gambling addicts outside of a safe environment with virtually no regulation and that can be used by kids and teens!

          I actually wouldn’t have anything against gacha games if they all were marked as Adult-only, even the most dumbass parents would think twice about buying EA FC if it had the AO rating.

          • Carighan Maconar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            And not only AO, if it included the same required gambling-warnings other gambling system have to show every time they so much as mention their name.

        • This is fine🔥🐶☕🔥@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Probably because CCP wants other countries’ citizens to be addicted to games but not their own.

          How else would they have 9-9-6 model if Chinese youth started going down the path of Japanese hikikomoris?

      • Ilflish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well China doesn’t like companies having power so this is a way to neuter them, especially in response to trying to limit online game consumption already.

        Edit: Tencent is apparently the most profitable company in china right now so this is a direct attack at their profits most likely, not just China doing good

        Edit2: This video goes into it a bit https://youtu.be/uieLEIVlQgc?si=mNiOlXPn9k7V6XX-

  • filister@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Didn’t China also recently introduce a limit of hours adolescents can game?

    The world would be a better place without those transactions in my opinion. It might sound extreme but in my view this is the first step towards gambling addiction.

    We as humanity are becoming really obsessed with everything digital instead of spending more time physically interacting with our peers. And unfortunately I am no exception.

    • bionicjoey
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      ·
      1 year ago

      Part of the problem is that there’s no incentive for game companies to ensure that players are of an appropriate age and are gambling responsibly. It’s a Pandora’s box of capitalism in the same way fossil fuels, cigarettes, and big pharma are. Their customers have a demand for their product which is driven by a physiological/psychological/socioeconomic need, so they aren’t subject to normal market mechanics.

    • EssentialCoffee@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      In 2019, it was limited to 90 minutes on weekdays and not between the hours of 10 pm to 8 am.

      In 2021, it was changed to 1 hour per day, only on Fridays, weekends, and public holidays.

  • yamanii@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If there’s a behavior psychologist/researcher involved in the creation of a product, it’s evil, simple as. Those gacha games absolutely use them.

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.gg
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you could go two ways with that. The psychologist could be under a mandate to give feedback to ensure your game is not going to be an addiction or they could be under a mandate to make it as addictive as possible. The latter is way more likely but I wouldn’t totally rule out the value add of any psychologist to any game.

  • Wahots@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    God, I hope they do that here. Would clear the appstores and other stores of 90% of shovelware overnight.

  • Ahri Boy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    1 year ago

    The S$20000 ($15000) Genshin Impact buying spree incident in Singapore had indirectly contributed to proposed legislation.

  • notannpc@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    1 year ago

    Limiting micro transactions and banning predatory reward schemes in video games is genuinely a good thing. We need this to spread around the world.

  • southsamurai@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Even a broken clock is right twice a day. Assuming it’s a clock that’s capable of being right twice a day, which isn’t every clock.

    • Damage@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Y’all should temper down the sinophobia and just take a good thing for a good thing

      • ArxCyberwolf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Sinophobia? Bullshit. Being critical of the Chinese government is not being hateful towards its people. Find something better to be offended over.

        • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          China engages in this kind of “social democracy” all the time just like countries like Norway. But when Norway does it you don’t see people saying “rare Norway win”. I would call having a different standard for China vs a European country sinophobic.

          If you’re a left progressive —as most people here on Lemmy seem to be— you probably agree with most of China’s economic policy.

          China does sometimes engage in Chinese nationalism in a way that is worthy of criticism; but pretending they are worse than the U.S. in this regard is detached from reality.

          The American ruling class has already decided they want war with China. They’re just trying to find a way to justify it to us. We as progressives shouldn’t make it easy for them to justify a war between 2 nuclear powers. Such a war could very well lead to the end of the human race.

          • ByGourou@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            China does sometimes engage in Chinese nationalism in a way that is worthy of criticism; but pretending they are worse than the U.S. in this regard is detached from reality.

            Lmao

            • SailorMoss@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Care to elaborate? I assure you genocide and the end of humanity are no laughing matter.

              The U.S. is currently supporting a genocide in Palestine/Israel. Before that we spent 2 decades in a war —based on a lie— in which the U.S. killed up to 1 million innocent Iraqis.

              We are currently occupying many territories, to whom we deny equal rights/status as states including Guam and Puerto Rico.

              Over the last century we constantly supported coups of democratically elected governments mostly in South and Central America. (See the Monroe doctrine).

              Not to mention the soft imperialism of the IMF and the world bank.

              China deserves criticism for their genocide of the Uyghur Muslims.

              There may be further valid criticisms if they invade Taiwan. This could go either way depending on what the Taiwanese people ultimately decide. Right now most Taiwanese want to maintain the status quo. Which is strategic ambiguity.

              https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_on_Taiwanese_identity

              Edit: I might also add the U.S. is currently undermining the Taiwanese people’s desire for strategic ambiguity. Putting its own geopolitical interests ahead of the desires and well-being of the Taiwanese people.

              The U.S. record of nationalist imperialism is worse than China’s.

              • ByGourou@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                I’m not going to argue on who is worse, sorry, I’m not educated enough to convince someone. But yeah if you pin the middle east genocide to the us (which you should) it’s bad, and I don’t know how it compare to the Uyghur’s genocide.

                Edit: I might also add the U.S. is currently undermining the Taiwanese people’s desire for strategic ambiguity. Putting its own geopolitical interests ahead of the desires and well-being of the Taiwanese people.

                Just about that, isn’t China doing way more shit on that one ? I know most Taiwanese want the status quo but there are mass campain from China to take Taiwan, and I’ve never heard of the opposite.

        • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Sinophobia? Bullshit. Being critical of the Chinese government is not being hateful towards its people. Find something better to be offended over.

          Triggered much?

        • Sneezycat@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          This post is about China, and they obviously mean China when saying “broken clock”. What else would they be talking about??

          But I disagree with it being sinophobia; criticism doesn’t equal hate.

          • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Calling china a broken clock is not sinophobia, it’d be sinophobia if it were saying the clock is broken by virtue of being chinese.

            Same as if i were to shit on the US because it’s a clown country or because it’s run by white people.

  • JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s so much addiction and gambling engineered into micro transactions, it’s crazy. I’m glad China is regulating it.

  • kaffiene@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 year ago

    Good. These kinds of transactions are exploitative and prey in the weaknesses of people with addictive personalities

  • Nephalis@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do you all expect localization is tied to laws for china? I realy don’t think so. Most games are split into global and asia/chinese versions anyway. Why should they remove these mechanics when it isn’t necessary for the market they operate in?

    • echo64@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The thought process is that for many games, the majority of their revenue comes from these mechanics and from China. The games themselves will need to change to get revenue flowing. And new games won’t be made with this revenue source in general.

      This is similar to how eu regulations can lead to global changes sometimes, China is a big enough market to affect things globally.

      • yamanii@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yep, I’m not in the EU but thanks to the GDPR I still see the cookies thing on almost every website I go, sometimes these things have a good ripple effect.

  • xePBMg9@lemmynsfw.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    This will also make for better and more enjoyable games. I wonder if players will want to spend more times with those games then.