Bettman says he’s okay if you want to bring back the rule against forward passes, he doesn’t mind if you want to revert to old-school icing, he just demends you keep it to one rule change; you know, evolution is better than revolution…

What rule are you changing, tweaking, binning or creating.

  • ryan213
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Plus you won’t have to explain what it means to someone who doesn’t watch hockey. Actually, get rid of icing too!

    • ericjmorey@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Icing the puck is a big advantage to the team with the lead if there’s no penalty for it. Maybe only have it be a penalty if you have a lead.

      • ryathal@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s also a big advantage to defenders in general, as icing the puck would now allow lines to change, instead of one team getting stuck on the ice for long periods in their own zone.