Israeli officials are facing backlash after years of Prime Minister Benjamin “Bibi” Netanyahu quietly allowing Hamas to remain in power.

But reporting in the New York Times has revealed that Netanyahu’s government was more hands-on about helping Hamas: they helped a Qatari diplomat bring suitcases of cash into Gaza, indirectly boosting the militant organization, according to the report.

The calculus — the Times reported on Sunday, citing Israeli officials, Netanyahu’s critics, and the man’s own reported statements — was to keep Hamas strong enough to counteract the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank, allowing Netanyahu to avoid a two-state peace solution and keep both sides weak.

Israeli security officials got it wrong; they didn’t think Hamas was capable, or even interested, in launching a large attack against the Jewish state.

    • ILikeBoobies
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How so?

      I’d hardly call what they’re doing unique

      • ???@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh no, Israel can’t be bad since everyone else also kills and maims, but let’s forget they have killed a large number of civilians in a span of 2 months, more journalists and medical professionals and UN workers in any other conflict ever. Boo fucking hoo.

          • ???@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            You were responding to someone saying Israel are the worst. Worst, being the superlative of bad and all.

              • ???@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Hmmm, you’re right, I guess it would be more correct like this: “Israel can’t be more bad than the average genocider…”

                • ILikeBoobies
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  It would be more correct of a statement by you

                  But the person I replied to could have just called them bad…or explained why they are worse than every other genocidal group

        • ILikeBoobies
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Historically it does seem to be a reoccurring theme but they aren’t even the only group doing that today

          • ???@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            What exactly is your point? Because I seriously doubt that it’s math…

            • ILikeBoobies
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              My point was to ask why they think Israel is the absolute worst

              • ???@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Ok. How far back are we talking in history? Just to know if I should throw Genghis Khan in or not, so we can do a top 10 and see where Israel lands

                • ILikeBoobies
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Feel like everyone is fair game if we are using “absolute”