• aelwero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    We need to get rid of riders… Someone propose a “one bill-one item” rule already, and stick that motherfucker on every single fucking bill as a rider until something comes along that’ll bait em all into that shit.

    • PupBiru@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      perhaps, but combining bills does allow for good ways of compromise… i’ll pass your bill that i don’t agree with if you pass a change to this other thing that addresses my concerns, etc

    • tacosplease@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Obama did something like that. It didn’t work. All the little add ons are so each politician in a contested district can get something for their voters to justify all the other parts of the bill their voters don’t like. Without that nothing ever gets passed.

    • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What if I told you that slime ball Matt Gaetz has already proposed this issue multiple times. Not sure how I feel about that but it’s the only sane thing I’ve heard from his side.

      • tacosplease@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Because it would cause gridlock. That’s why Gaetz wants to do it. There are too many things to pass one at a time. There are not enough affirmative votes on most single issues to pass anything. You need the little extra things to pull in the politicians who would otherwise not vote for that one thing because their local base doesn’t want it.

        • CleoTheWizard@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I don’t really support that implementation. The single topic vote causes problems. Not every senator needs to be well informed on every single issue they vote for. That’s what committees are for. And what the rest of the party is for.

      • aelwero@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        15
        ·
        1 year ago

        Don’t know a single thing about Matt Gaetz, and Google suggests I really wouldn’t care to :)

        I’m a moderate, a (GASP!) Jordan Peterson type. Gaetz sounds partisan enough that I wouldn’t listen to him for more than about 15 seconds, but I gotta qualify that remark by saying I’m not really part of his opposition either, because not choosing a side is basically not a thing anymore and I do it anyway ;)

        • Zink@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m registered as an independent, and am not a fan of how political parties lead people to bundle opinions together. However, if you insist on not “taking a side” in today’s political climate, you either aren’t paying attention or you’re in denial that you prefer the bad guys. If you don’t know anything about Matt Gaetz, I’ll give you the benefit of the doubt that you’re the former.

          This independent’s “side” for the foreseeable future is whoever has the highest likelihood of beating their Republican opponent.

  • Rapidcreek@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    The Putin Caucus at work. (Trump is Putin’s lapdog. Tell your friends.)

    So I guess Moscow Mitch is back.

    • Jeff@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      He glitched enough times it forced a rebuild of his OS back to Komrad v1.01

    • Something_Complex@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Almost as if they where working for china and Russia trying to discredit the us internally but they are or too stupid or too greedy to notice.

      Or both

  • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Trump moved billions for the useless border wall from military funding without consulting the House.

    Just do that and write an IOU to the pentagon. Although I’m sure they won’t mind. The more Russians Ukraine blows up are less our troops will have to fight in the future.

  • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Honestly best thing Republicans have done in the past 20 years. Don’t get me wrong Ukraine needs US support, but this is the fault of the dinosaurs that decided Ukrainian and aid support for Israel’s genocide are synonymous.

    • Zorque@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ukraine support was already under fire, they tried to push it through by attaching it to the Israel package.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Well I guess in a way they’re standing up for their principles? Anyway I just wish Ukrainian aid could just pass without support for Israel’s genocide.

    • BraveSirZaphod@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This has nothing to do with Israel. Republicans would nuke Gaza if they could.

      This is them holding up broadly popular legislation in order to make some stupid demands on “border security” so they can tell their constituents that they basically built a wall.

      • NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah I know. I’m just happy they’re fucking themselves over at the expense of Israel’s genocide, though it’s sad that Ukraine got caught up in the mess.

  • Sami_Uso@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    1 year ago

    Boy Libs sure do love themselves a war. Especially when it’s halfway across the world and they don’t have to send their own children to die.

  • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    Correct me of I’m wrong, but I’m pretty sure the president has the authority to send troops to engage an enemy for up to like 60 days before needing to have anything cleared by congress.

    If this is how Republicans want to play, we could still still support Ukraine by intervening directly.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        What I wish for is that Putin trips over a dildo and suffers a spinal injury that triggers every single one of his pain receptors so that all he can experience from here on out is pure agony, effectively removing him from power and marking an end to his stupid fucking war.

        …but short of that, I’ll settle for another option that marks an end to his stupid fucking war; and while we can hope for the former, we can actually accomplish the latter.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The last thing we want to do is show Russia that the threat of escalation is their free pass to wipe other countries off the map. The best thing we can do in terms of impact on the US, is to arm Ukraine so that they’re capable of winning this stupid fucking war on their own; but republicans are blocking that, because they don’t give a fuck about human life.

        I don’t see any good options on the table… so, what’s the least-bad option?

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh dang, I forgot about escalation. Which country should we feed to Putin after he’s done destroying Ukraine? Gotta keep him appeased at all costs!

            • NoIWontPickaName@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              So you would like to march American troops into another fucking war? We have been at war over half my life, I’m done with it.

              Give those boys all they need short of boots on ground.

              If you don’t like my opinion, feel free to block me.✌️

              • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Putin can end the war any minute. That’s what I’d like. But he won’t.

                Failing that, enabling Ukraine to defend itself is the next best option. That’s what I’d like. But republicans are doing their evil shit again and blocking that route.

                All of the remaining options are shit. If you don’t like what I’m proposing, dude I’m with you: I don’t like it either. This whole situation is horrible, and it’s shameful as fuck that we have politicians here in the US that are hell-bent on enabling Putin.

                …but what’s left to do? Throw our hands up and say “gg republicans, you outplayed us! Putin, Ukraine’s all yours!”?

    • JimboDHimbo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      …you want dead or wounded American soldiers? Disgusting.

      Edit: just to clarify, my point is that we’re all human, no matter the occupation. You shouldn’t think of sending troops like moving a chess piece. That’s someone’s family member.

      • Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Speaking as a vet - I understand the implication. I also understand the implication of just letting Russia decimate other countries without consequence. Families are being murdered on your chess board right now whether or not they fly our colors. Russia is currently in a severely weakened state, so a full military response from the US and hopefully our allies would end the war practically over night.

        The best option is for Russia to pull out on its own - that’s not going to happen. The second best option is for Ukraine to defend itself in a manner effective enough to force Russia to withdraw - republicans are blocking that. The third best option is for the rest of the world to step in to swiftly end wars of aggression.

        The worst thing we can do is show Russia that the threat of escalation is enough to give them a free pass to just wipe other countries off the map.

      • abbotsbury@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        I mean, if it’s between people who didn’t volunteer and people who did, I would have to say it should be the volunteers (US military)

  • penquin@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    38
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    They have actually done something good for once. God damn. I know it’s not out of the goodness of their hearts, but still, I like it. Bring on the downvotes. Yummy in my tummy.

        • Drusas@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m with you on that one, but I wish the attention from Ukraine hadn’t been completely diverted to Gaza. I’m sure Putin is very happy about it, however.

          • Sami_Uso@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Dems trying to conflate the problems of Ukraine with the problems of Israel is a joke. They are not the same, and to even pretend they are is disingenuous and downright ignorant.

    • DontMakeMoreBabies@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Every dollar spent on Ukraine is more Russian blood in the ground. And we get to feed the MIC.

      Good ROI if you ask me.

      • Fried_out_Kombi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Plus, every dollar spent on Ukraine buys a lessened chance of other nuclear powers trying to invade their neighbors willy-nilly. If Russia is allowed to just invade whomever they want with minimal pushback from the world, that just emboldens more wannabe Putins to start wars of aggression or worse, build up nuclear arsenals.

    • eran_morad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      How do you not see that Ukraine is fighting not only for itself, but for the entire Western order?

      • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ukraine is fighting for US. Self-interests and nothing else. The US has not fighting to win this war. The US is fighting to prolong this war to decimate you crane and allow corporations like Citibank and Black Rock to take over all of its resources

    • MisterD
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ok then. When Ukraine falls, we’ll send in US troops to stop Russia. I take it you’ll be first in line to join them.

      • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        29
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you haven’t been paying attention Ukraine is failing, and everything we’ve been told will happen to Russia has been a lie.

        • reddwarf@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So when you see a state fail when pulled into a war by a fascistic country, led by a psychopath dictator who has bigger desires of waging more wars after Ukraine falls, your proposal is to just let them go and fail? Do you need a history lesson on what happened a couple of decades ago when that type of appeasement went very wrong?

            • reddwarf@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Glad you recognize this as a war instead of the russian deceptive ‘special operation’.

              And there would be no war if russia did not start one. Lets keep the facts real.

              • GodlessCommie@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                11
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Russia only fired the first shot, the US/Obama started it years back. Let’s keep the facts real

                • MisterD
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  4
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Wow. Putin needed to start this war so that Russians would be distracted from the fact that Putin was not good for the country. Obama had nothing to do with it.