• sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    If they’re “just” buying memorabilia, then they aren’t necessarily producing hate speech.

    It’s unclear what the site sells, but if someone bought a replica gun for a particularly tasteless Halloween costume, then they haven’t broken hate speech laws. I think.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      That’s true. I guess you could argue any of it could potentially be for educational purposes. You’d need to collect evidence on how the items are being used, as well.

      That kind of nuance is something angry mobs are bad at, so I agree with OP there. I just wish the actual government cared more.

      • Oldmandan
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        The human propensity for ignorance should never be underestimated; I can also see the possibility (to use an example product from the antihate article) someone somehow stumbled into buying shotglasses with norse runes on them because they thought they were cool, not realizing the broader context of the site. Is that likely? No, but again, people are really good at doing dumb shit. :P

    • AnotherDirtyAnglo
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      And pedophiles who buy CSAM and never touch an actual child aren’t producing child porn. But they’re still obviously part of the problem.