Look, we can debate the proper and private way to do Captchas all day, but if we
remove the existing implementation we will be plunged into a world of hurt. I
run tucson.social - a tiny instance with barely any users and I find myself
really ticked off at other Admin’s abdication of duty when it comes to engaging
with the developers. For all the Fediverse discussion on this, where are the
github issue comments? Where is our attempt to convince the devs in this. No,
seriously WHERE ARE THEY? Oh, you think that just because an “Issue” exists to
bring back Captchas is the best you can do? NO it is not the best we can do, we
need to be applying some pressure to the developers here and that requires
EVERYONE to do their part. The Devs can’t make Lemmy an awesome place for us if
us admins refuse to meaningfully engage with the project and provide feedback on
crucial things like this. So are you an admin? If so, we need more comments
here: https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3200
[https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3200] We need to make it VERY clear
that Captcha is required before v0.18’s release. Not after when we’ll all be
scrambling… EDIT: To be clear I’m talking to all instance admins, not just
Beehaw’s. UPDATE: Our voices were heard!
https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3200#issuecomment-1600505757
[https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/3200#issuecomment-1600505757] The
important part was that this was a decision to re-implement the old (if
imperfect) solution in time for the upcoming release. mCaptcha and better techs
are indeed the better solution, but at least we won’t make ourselves more
vulnerable at this critical juncture.
User @[email protected] posted a call to pressure the devs to return CAPTCHA support before v.0.18 arrives on the community [email protected].
Mixed response from users and beehaw admins.
Lemmy issue #2922 is where it was removed 2 weeks ago due to its effectiveness being limited, Lemmy issue #3200 is the issue where it is suggested to have it return. Repo maintainers are somewhat perceptive to reverting it but would be more willing to accept a full implementation of graphical CAPTCHA over the previous version.