• Fermiverse@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 year ago

    For all Proxmox users it looks like the new ZFS kernel module with the patch is included in the opt-in kernel 6.5.11-6-pve for now.

    The kernel 6.5 actually became the default in Proxmox 8.1, so a regular dist-upgrade should bring it in. Run “zpool --version” after rebooting and double check you get this:

    zfs-2.2.0-pve4 zfs-kmod-2.2.0-pve4

    As this versions are patched for bug.

    • varsock@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The statement is very informative. The bug happens under increased read/write operations to the same file causing a race condition.

      I also found interesting:

      Despite the bug being present in OpenZFS for many years, this issue has not been found to impact any TrueNAS systems. The bug fix is scheduled to be included in OpenZFS 2.2.2 within the next week

  • Avid Amoeba
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It looks like due to the older coreutils Ubuntu 22.04 LTS is unlikely to be affected as much. So if you’re on Ubuntu LTS and have not compiled it yourself, you might have dodged data corruption.

    Would this corruption be caught by the checksumming?

    No

    • Fermiverse@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This seems to affect ZFS >=2.2.0. Ubuntu 22.04 LTS is on ZFS 2.1.5

      Nope!

      OpenZFS through 2.1.13 and 2.2.x through 2.2.1 contain this bug.

      This issue occurs less often in version 2.2.1, and in versions before 2.1.4, because of the default configuration in those versions.

      From here

      • Avid Amoeba
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Weird. Reading the issue on GitHub I got the impression that it affects 2.2.0+.

        Also I glanced something that the version of coreutils also contributes to the interaction.

        E: Seems like Ubuntu LTS is unlikely to be affected a lot due to the older coreutils.

        • Fermiverse@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Jep, it seems like Damocles Sword was hanging above us the whole time (⊙_⊙)

          • Avid Amoeba
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            At this point I think I’m just gonna wait for the patch to land in Ubuntu.

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    LTS Long Term Support software version
    RAID Redundant Array of Independent Disks for mass storage
    ZFS Solaris/Linux filesystem focusing on data integrity

    3 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 13 acronyms.

    [Thread #335 for this sub, first seen 4th Dec 2023, 15:25] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • Atemu@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    But my filesystem has RAID and checksums and I use ECC memory, I don’t need backups /s