I found such a photo on the Internet and became interested in what function such a structure could perform.

    • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      424
      ·
      1 year ago

      1000006081

      These are great for wildlife as they provide a safe crossing over high-speed highways. They are usually design to be in already existing migration paths where moving a proposed highway may not work and not disrupting migration paths is of importance.

      • Funderpants
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        55
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        1 year ago

        Looks like a nice choke point for a predator to hang about.

        • SzethFriendOfNimi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          48
          ·
          1 year ago

          Possibly but I’d think it’s still safer than vehicles and less disruptive to overall migration for a given species.

          I wonder if there’s been any studies showing how effective, if at all, these are.

          • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            39
            ·
            1 year ago

            There have been study’s, these crossing are usually design to feel like open fields in a sense, so most animals will cross quick and on high alert to get through the “opening” in the field.

        • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          1 year ago

          Are there any predators smart enough to strategize like this? I know that some use water holes as hunting grounds, but that’s probably more instinctive than actual strategy.

          • gohixo9650@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            30
            ·
            1 year ago

            Are there any predators smart enough to strategize like this?

            it is the predators that build such passages. Have you ever seen any construction company building them? Even in the first photo that is under construction, there is not any human worker in sight

            • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              That under construction pit is the pit of the manlion. It’s similar to the pit of the antlion, except for construction workers.

              They always have to deal with the manlion before they start building. Often by pouring concrete over it.

          • CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            Would they need to be that smart? Ambush predators that stay in roughly one area, for example, could naturally grow their numbers in the area around such a chokepoint simply by virtue of the ones in that area having more food available and therefore better survival chances.

            • FooBarrington@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I think that these human-made structures provide such a different environment (loud sounds from cars, moving/flashing lights etc.) that previous instinctual adaptations wouldn’t trigger.

          • andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            They can track other species by smell at least. If that path is used by too many and smells like a farm, they would probably get used to hang around it naturally.

          • KISSmyOS@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t think many areas exist where you have both a need and political will for building nature bridges, and also large predators.

          • Metatronz@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Maybe canines? Idk

            I just think it would be dope to drive under as a dramatic fight between an elk and wolves tumbled off the side onto my vehicle. Killing all of us instantly. What a way to go!

          • credit crazy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I know octopi have been escaping their aquarium enclosures and covering their tracks that humans would see. Just to take one at a time pray from their tank. If I recall correctly even killer wailes have been taking down human boats. In conclusion there are for Shure aquatic predators that use genuine strategy. Granted with my killer waile example is a similar case of is it strategy or instinct.

          • Echo Dot@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I don’t imagine it would be a major problem though maybe it would let them get one or two easy meals but predators don’t hunt unless they’re hungry. So once they’ve taken down one prey animal they’ll ignore the rest. On a species level it’s probably not a major issue.

            As opposed to roads which will kill lots of animals.

          • Funderpants
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’d like to read about that,understand how it’s done. it’s a thought I have whenever I see them but of course the professionals designing them would have thought about it.

            • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              30
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              There was a documentary I watch years ago where they went into great detail into this, as well as the design of these things. Can’t remember where i saw this documentary though.

              Anyways, researchers setup cameras trigger by movement and body heat to watch these overpasses and found no evidence of higher predetor active.

              They also went into detail about how these things are design with extra width and gentle slopes to make them as “friendly” as possible depending on the specific species that will be migrating in the area, as different wildlife species prefer different types of crossing structures.

              For example:

              Grizzly bears and wolves

              Wary animals like grizzly bears and wolves there is a “learning curve”, it may take up to five years before they feel secure using newly built crossings. Grizzly bears, elk, moose and deer prefer wildlife crossings that are high, wide and short in length, including overpasses

              Cougars and black bears

              Cougars and black bears prefer long, low and narrow crossings such as underpasses.

              Elk

              Elk are usually the first large species to use the new crossings, even using some while they are still under construction!

              Here are some articles that talk about some of the studies:

              https://wildlife.org/wild-cam-do-predators-ambush-at-underpasses/

              https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-020-67340-8

              • Sparlock@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yea elk don’t give a fuck about much really. We have a few herds where I live and they don’t even move when we walk our dogs nearby. I even have a video of one coming right up to the fence around my property, both my great pyrenees were losing their minds with the elk less than a foot away, the elk seemed more curious about the noisy little things (“little” relative to a full grown elk that is) than anything else.

            • GingeyBook@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              IIRC they just hire someone to sit there and say “shoo” at any potential predators

        • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          It is like that playground game, but with less violence since only one player gets hurt at a time.

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s also amazing visually! Forget regular highways! Let’s have buried highways! That’s especially good for if our country is invaded because we can install physical barriers to logistical supply lines against us!

        • LufyCZ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Buried highways would be insanely expensive, and in the case of invasion, one well placed shot would completely kill logistics for the defenders as much as it would for the invaders, so probably not the best idea to rely on those

    • spankinspinach@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      70
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is the one! They’re ridiculously effective, so much so that my home provinces is sinking like 250 million into building 5 more of them over the next 5 years

      • Mango@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        It actually takes 50 million to make these? Gimme 50 good men who want to be millionaires and we can figure out the capital cost between us.

    • Slow@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Will there be compacted earth on top of the tunnel so animals can walk?

    • MrJameGumb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      So I was technically right in saying it would be an overpass, and as we all know technically right is the best kind of right lol

    • Snapz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Nature is already a “nature highway”, we fucked it up and now consultants sell the term “nature highway” to act like they are doing someone a favor. This is just restoring SOME man-made damage to an area to a less functional state than original for (hundreds of?) millions of dollars. Better than nothing sure, but not a “nature highway” for Simba, Timon and Pumba to dance and sing songs upon.

        • Moneo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          51
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          And the true motive bubbles to the surface. Drivers must be prioritized at all costs.

          Edit: damn y’all really salty, ask yourself what the chances are they would have built this if only wildlife benefitted and maybe you’ll see my point

          • lazylion_ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            28
            ·
            1 year ago

            If thats all it was, they would just build fences instead of bridges.

          • MJBrune@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Pretty silly to think “Oh that’s the human’s true motive, self-preservation! I got you now, you sly humans!”

            • Moneo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              My point is everyone is talking about how great this is for wildlife but there’s no way they would build this if only the wildlife were benefitting from it.

          • weew
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You think people built entire highways just because they wanted the most inefficient and expensive way to screw over some deer? No fucking shit all this infrastructure is for driving.

            • Moneo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              No I thought they built highways because they wanted the most inefficient and expensive way to get around.

      • Syndic@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 year ago

        More or less safe. Predators often camp these choke points for obvious reasons.

          • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I mean, I thought it was obviously a joke, and you’re there with me. Right? I took the use of land bridges, nature bridges, animal bridges, whatever term is used, and used it to compare the State of New Jersey to a continent, neither of which are homogenous enough to be able to even make a comparison.

            I’m just curious why you really hope it’s a joke though. I suppose I have the ire of some Europeans in drawing such a conclusion, and I’m genuinely curious why that’s the case.

            I guess the best place to start would be what’s European?

            • StorminNorman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              The thing that made me question it is that Americans have a tendency of saying dumb stuff like you did, and mean it. Cos like you said, there is very little to properly compare them.

        • GiddyGap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Were essentially Europe of America.

          Get back to me when you have mandatory vacation time, universal healthcare, universal college-level education, universal pre-k, family leave, modern public transportation, non-crumbling infrastructure, climate-friendly policies, etc, etc.

          • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            NJ offers free community college, they’re working on universal preschool but it varies district to district (my district is about to move it to thee years old), NJ Transit trains are built in Germany, so that’s something right? We are working on offshore wind farms but the Dutch company backed out (and to be fair the economy is a shit show and I get it and I won’t point fingers). NJ is pretty much as progressive as it gets in the US, which is why I referred to it, tongue in cheek, as the Europe of America.

            Some of the US is trying, and the amount of unjustified shit reddit, and now Lemmy, throw indiscriminately at the US is foolish. To suggest Mississippi and Vermont are the same is just not true, but that’s the vibe I get when I scroll through “America Bad” after “America Bad” post.

            There’s no reason for people to be up on their high horse when we’re all a decade away from collapse. Let’s be friends and joke with one another. Sometimes all you got is jokes.

  • BURN@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    99
    ·
    1 year ago

    They disrupt the nature a little less. Animals aren’t hit crossing the street because they can go over and other small benefits like that. They also look nice and tunnels are fun when your car sounds nice

  • dubbe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Could be for a skii-slope as well. There are similar structures in Are, Sweden for example.

    • Mr_Blott@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      On ski mountains these are usually placed in an avalanche prone area to stop the snow blocking the road

  • dubbe@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I Are they are used to ski over the road, it enables the slope to go all the way to the city cente.