• USNewsJunkie@newsie.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    @zephyreks There you go again. You’re either blatantly trying to mislead people or you’re an idiot.

    "But “it has been our assessment now that it did not collect while it was transiting the United States or over flying the United States”.

    He said the efforts the US took to mitigate any intelligence gathering “contributed” to the balloon’s failure to gather sensitive information."

    https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-66062562

    • zephyreks
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do they teach English where you’re from? The Pentagon is saying two things: 1. The balloon did not collect information while transiting the US, and 2. Even if it tried to, the US prevented anything sensitive from being leaked. Read their press release again, please.

    • zephyreks
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m seriously confused where you get your impression from. It’s been known that lead exposure leads to hallucinations, so you might want to get your paint checked out?

      • USNewsJunkie@newsie.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        @zephyreks You could only be seriously confused about where I get my “impression” from if you’re an absolute idiot considering I included the link to the BBC article where I got that “impression”.

        Yeah, we agree that it was not collected. But, you keep leaving out the part about where they tried. Make sure you put that in your talking points next time. They tried but failed. Ergo, they did not collect any intelligence.

        • zephyreks
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Nowhere in the article does it say that they tried.

          I’m like legitimately worried for you. Lead contamination is a serious problem.

          • USNewsJunkie@newsie.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            @zephyreks Here’s another one for you then. See if you can comprehend what Brigadere General Pat Ryder is saying…

            "Ryder was asked Thursday whether he believes those U.S. mitigation efforts were responsible for the balloon’s failure to gather any info.

            “Certainly, the efforts that we made contributed,” he said."

            https://abcnews.go.com/US/chinese-spy-balloon-american-made-parts-transmit-data/story?id=100476856

            • zephyreks
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Last I checked, the Pentagon falls higher on the scale of “reliable statements by government” than some random General.

              • USNewsJunkie@newsie.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                @zephyreks dude I don’t know any other way to explain it to you so that you can comprehend it. The balloon was trying to collect information and was thwarted. You have it from a brigadier general that mitigation efforts certainly contributed to the balloon not collecting any information. You can try and act like it was just not collecting information out of the goodness of the Chinese’s heart, but that is a blatant misrepresentation of fact.

                • zephyreks
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Not according to the Pentagon, which last I checked was a more reliable source than a single General. A General can say whatever they want, but the Pentagon has to actually check facts.

                  • USNewsJunkie@newsie.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    @zephyreks You work for the Pentagon? I notice that you’ve made that claim twice without any reference material to justify your claim. But sure, if you feel the need to impune the character of a US Brigadere General and esentially call him in a liar, I know who I’m going to trust and it’s not your word.

                  • USNewsJunkie@newsie.social
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    @zephyreks Out of curiosity… who exactly do you think you’re hearing from when you hear from the Pentagon? Joe Smoe from down the street? No, it’s a member of the military just like the Brig. Gen.