YouTube’s Loaded With EV Disinformation::When it comes to articles on a website like CleanTechnica, there are two kinds of articles. First, there are the … [continued]

  • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Of course there are exceptions, there are people who live in the absolute ass end of nowhere and they should have a car but those people are a tiny minority. They are in fact such a minority it makes no difference if they drive an ICE car or an electric one when it comes to climate change.

    The vast majority of people live in cities, towns, villages, etc. Hook those up with train tracks and if a city is big enough build trams in the city and you got 99% of the people covered, while reducing road maintenance budget to almost nothing, improving local air quality massively, reduce microplastics from tires to pretty much nothing, make noise pollution a thing of the past and reduce tailpipe emissions to a negligible amount.

    • joshhsoj1902
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is where I think you have a skewed picture of reality.

      In North America 20% of people live in rural areas.

      As much as I wish that was “vast majority” it isn’t.

      Your simple view of public transit doesn’t line up with the realities in North America. I wish it did, but it doesn’t. And unfortunately your uninformed arguments are the fuel actual opponents of public transit use to justify their position.

      It doesn’t help the cause to spread uninformed arguments

      • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t live in the US. Are you saying 20% of all people in the US live outside any settlement?

        Even if that’s the case that’s one country, it’s applicable to every other country.

        • joshhsoj1902
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Every country I look up has at least 15% of their population loving in rural areas.

          Yes this means that ~20% of most countries live outside low density towns or high density cities.

          • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Rural doesn’t mean a farmhouse in the middle of nowhere. Small towns and villages should absolutely get a train connection.

            • joshhsoj1902
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Rural does mostly mean farmhouses and houses in the woods. And yes small villages should get a train connection. But remember you’re suggesting this is a cheap and easy solution when compared to EVs, what you’re suggesting would be very very expensive.

              • FluffyPotato@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                So you’re saying the US has enough farmhouses in the middle of nowhere away from any settlement for about 70 million people? That is definitely not the case for Europe at least.

                Also that’s still cheaper than maintenance for roads.