Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agoSouth Korean dog farmers threaten to flood Seoul with 2 million canines over banwww.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square77fedilinkarrow-up1212arrow-down15cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1207arrow-down1external-linkSouth Korean dog farmers threaten to flood Seoul with 2 million canines over banwww.independent.co.ukLee Duna@lemmy.nz to World News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square77fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareinterceder270@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24arrow-down18·edit-21 year agoI mean, if we’re talking about ‘efficient ways to get calories’, then farming any animal is a stupid way to do that. You lose so much energy feeding them than if you just ate the food yourself or used the land to grow food. Always funny watching where meat-eaters draw the line with their abuse. There is more cognitive dissonance among ya’ll than conservatives.
minus-squareFondots@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up19arrow-down1·1 year agoThe question posed was whether farming dogs is worse than farming other animals, and that is the question I attempted to answer. The question was not whether farming any animal for food is ethical or justifiable, and so I didn’t attempt to answer that.
minus-squareabstractastronaut@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down18·1 year agoJust a small pointer: If the goal was to convince the person you replied to, the third condescending paragraph is a surefire way to make them not listen, which is a shame because the first two paragraphs are actually solid arguments.
minus-squareinterceder270@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down25·1 year agoNo, my goal was to say what I wanted to say and I accomplished that to a tee. Just a small pointer: nobody cares about your pointers. Lol.
minus-squareClaidheamh@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up14arrow-down15·1 year agoWell, in that case, nobody cares about what you want to say, either.
minus-squareabstractastronaut@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down10·1 year agoI wouldn’t spend any more energy on them. They made it clear that they’re here to talk at people rather than talking with people.
I mean, if we’re talking about ‘efficient ways to get calories’, then farming any animal is a stupid way to do that.
You lose so much energy feeding them than if you just ate the food yourself or used the land to grow food.
Always funny watching where meat-eaters draw the line with their abuse. There is more cognitive dissonance among ya’ll than conservatives.
The question posed was whether farming dogs is worse than farming other animals, and that is the question I attempted to answer.
The question was not whether farming any animal for food is ethical or justifiable, and so I didn’t attempt to answer that.
Just a small pointer: If the goal was to convince the person you replied to, the third condescending paragraph is a surefire way to make them not listen, which is a shame because the first two paragraphs are actually solid arguments.
No, my goal was to say what I wanted to say and I accomplished that to a tee.
Just a small pointer: nobody cares about your pointers. Lol.
Well, in that case, nobody cares about what you want to say, either.
I wouldn’t spend any more energy on them. They made it clear that they’re here to talk at people rather than talking with people.