Alberta Premier Danielle Smith confirmed the her plan to invoke the Sovereignty Act on Your Province Your Premier on Saturday.

  • AnotherDirtyAnglo
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    1 year ago

    Danielle Smith: Letting 5 year olds decide what’s for dinner and when to go to bed.

  • Yardy Sardley
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Smith said the province tried to work collaboratively with the federal government to make the province’s electricity grid net zero by 2050

    “The feds didn’t capitulate to our demands so we’re taking the province of Alberta hostage”

    “We will not put our operators at risk of going to jail if they do not achieve the unachievable,”

    It’s unachievable, Danielle, because your ignorant ass put a moratorium on renewable energy projects. And why does she feel the need to feign sympathy for the dinosaurs at the top whose refusal to act is the reason we’re here in the first place? If they can’t conduct business in accordance with the law, they can gtfo of the way and make room for those who can.

    “…he’s a maverick. He doesn’t seem to care about the law, doesn’t care about the Constitution. I do.”

    Says the person who personally donated $60k to a seditious organization.

    As far as I’m concerned, these excuses are nothing but selfish and asinine. They only serve to vindicate and encourage the bad behaviour of those who ought to be taking responsibility. How exactly “It’s too expensive” is a serious take when we all just spent 4 consecutive months living inside a cloud of wildfire smoke is beyond me. Fuck off.

  • Showroom7561
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 year ago

    Oh, Alberta. This isn’t a good look, but neither is anything else you do. 🤭

    • pbjamm@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Pretty soon they will be blaming clean energy for the sorry state of the Oilers season.

      • JustADrone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        TRUDEAU WANTS TO RENAME OUR TEAM “THE SOLARS” DO THE SOVRINTY ACT THING!!!

  • ZC3rr0r
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 year ago

    Alberta is about to create a federal constitutional challenge, and find out that they are, despite the conservatives’ collective pipe dream, part of Canada.

    I can already hear the chorus of “this is a gross overreach of federal power” and “Trudeau is a dictator” whines coming from the usual culprits. And the base gets riled up even further…

    It’s starting to become ever more tempting to, at some point, actually give them that freedom they so desperately want and defederate Alberta from Canada. I give them about as long as California was actually independent for before they come begging to be let back in, after they come to the realization that they are a land-locked nation that depends on its neighbors and existing trade relationships and agreements to sell any of their precious oil to the world.

    Be careful what you wish for wild roses, you just might get it.

    • JustADrone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      separation would require a referendum, which would have 0% chance of passing. nobody wants this, beside some whackos. this is all posturing by the UCP, both to their base and to the federal government.

      • ZC3rr0r
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I know seperation is not popular enough to actually make it happen, but what I don;t understand is why this point gets brought up so much by the UCP if it isn’t popular enough to actually happen. If a politician/party is constantly harping about something I don’t actually support, why would I vote for them? It makes no sense.

      • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The only reason it “requires” a referendum is because Quebec went for that option in 1980, there’s nothing anywhere setting the separation process in stone, so technically a referendum isn’t necessary.

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think they would instead beg for the US to let them join the Union if a Republican was in power at the time.

          • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Really, that’s it? Damn. I bet we’d be a blue state, though, so maybe that’s a disincentive for that particular weird post-2016 thing.

              • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                You whippersnappers and not understanding the social credit party!! Why, in my day…

                Sure, we’re a conservative province in Canada, but in the US we’d still be to the left. We, overall, like having free healthcare and access to abortion. I swear the rest of Canada thinks we’re illiterate sometimes. Bro, I saw what happened in Ontario, get off your high horse.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Alberta has the record for the longest time with the same party in power, it was a conservative party from 1971 to 2015 and they beat the previous record that they previously held that was another conservative party from 1935 to 1971.

              Alberta’s NDP is conservative compared to the NDP everywhere else!

              • CanadaPlus@futurology.today
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Alberta and America have both changed a lot in the past decades. The rural areas would probably still be (light?) red, but most of the population is in Calgary and Edmonton, and they’re not going to go for no-joke Republicans that think the election was faked by a global cabal of pedophiles.

                The Alberta NDP is a bit like the Liberals in other places, I’d say.

                I’d argue that SoCred wasn’t conservative. It was anti-capitalist, for one thing; although it wasn’t really socialist either, but kind of it’s own thing.

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 year ago

                  Who’s the prime minister premier of Alberta? What % of the total vote did her party get?

                  I rest my case.

  • pixxelkick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    As an Edmontonian, this is perpetually exhausting.

    I don’t want to have to sell my house and move to Newfoundland, but it seems like maybe that’s what I am going to have to do if this shit keeps up.

    I have basically zero financial, cultural, spiritual, or emotional reason to stick around other than my family lives here.

  • Auli
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Isn’t Alberta and Saskatchewan the only provinces without electrical car rebates?