Reddit gave the snackexchange subreddit to someone who had no mod experience and hadn’t participated in the sub for years. The person claims they didn’t even ask for the position and only asked for the head mod to be removed. Reddit removed the top mod and made the person top mod.
That person had effectively no mod experience, but was already on the moderator list there - having been added by the old team.
Head mod chose to reopen under protest by turning off anti-scam bots and similar - letting sub continue to function visibly the same, but without the bot-supported protection it had used prior. He somehow talked his way onto the team during the protests, and then went to Admin and arranged to oust the head mod who had shut down the bots and was doing protest stuff in the sub.
He has since been returned to the bottom of the mod hierarchy there, for whatever that’s worth.
Like, I kind of get that guy’s point in some senses - simply turning off security features that quietly protect users, without announcing it, sure seems like the kind of thing that would hurt users pretty quick - without ever affecting site Admin. Especially when the head mod who shut down those bots wasn’t the user/mod who was responsible for them, it’s not ‘their’ bot if they’re gonna go home and take their toys, as it were.
Staging a coup and getting Admin to put him at the top of the modlist is hyper shitty, and Admin’s decision to promote someone who wasn’t really part of that community to that sort of position is utterly inexplicable if we were trying to square their actions with their stated values.
Reddit gave the snackexchange subreddit to someone who had no mod experience and hadn’t participated in the sub for years. The person claims they didn’t even ask for the position and only asked for the head mod to be removed. Reddit removed the top mod and made the person top mod.
That person had effectively no mod experience, but was already on the moderator list there - having been added by the old team.
Head mod chose to reopen under protest by turning off anti-scam bots and similar - letting sub continue to function visibly the same, but without the bot-supported protection it had used prior. He somehow talked his way onto the team during the protests, and then went to Admin and arranged to oust the head mod who had shut down the bots and was doing protest stuff in the sub.
He has since been returned to the bottom of the mod hierarchy there, for whatever that’s worth.
Like, I kind of get that guy’s point in some senses - simply turning off security features that quietly protect users, without announcing it, sure seems like the kind of thing that would hurt users pretty quick - without ever affecting site Admin. Especially when the head mod who shut down those bots wasn’t the user/mod who was responsible for them, it’s not ‘their’ bot if they’re gonna go home and take their toys, as it were.
Staging a coup and getting Admin to put him at the top of the modlist is hyper shitty, and Admin’s decision to promote someone who wasn’t really part of that community to that sort of position is utterly inexplicable if we were trying to square their actions with their stated values.