• darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    29
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s dumb. I understand restrictions on uncooked meats, but what harm could a cooked chicken breast do? This is what happens when officials blindly enforce rules without understanding the purpose of the rule in the first place.

    • zik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      It’s a genuine biosecurity risk in Australia. Australia (and NZ) are very susceptible to pathogens from outside so this kind of thing is taken very seriously in both countries.

      • jimbo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        It’s a genuine biosecurity risk in Australia.

        A cooked chicken sandwich? And letting in people who’ve eaten the sandwiches isn’t a biosecurity risk? Hmm. I’m questioning the genuineness of the concern.

      • CrayonRosary@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        You probably shouldn’t let any people in then.

        “Nope, don’t worry about that. It’s the chicken sandwiches that are the problem.”

    • timkenhan@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      You should be thankful it’s cooked.

      If it’s undercooked? Believe it or not, straight to jail.

      • C126@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        That’s dumb. I understand restrictions on uncooked meats, but what harm could a cooked chicken breast do? This is what happens when officials blindly enforce rules without understanding the purpose of the rule in the first place.

        Overcooked? Also jail.

    • Selmafudd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      44
      ·
      1 year ago

      Brah so we should test all chicken breast coming into the country to make sure it’s cooked? Who the fuck is paying for that? Or maybe you just don’t bring a fucking chicken burger on the plane…

      • nixcamic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        77
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s a case of common sense. Obviously an accident, obviously cooked. Throw it in the trash and move on with life. You crazy black and white maniacs that think every rule has to be applied 100% in every case with no possibility of anything ever happening that maybe doesn’t make sense or isn’t the intention of the people who wrote the rule are like 50% of what’s wrong with society.

        • Goku@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          ·
          1 year ago

          I have a feeling the granny probably pissed someone off along the way. I’m sure sometimes it gets thrown away and everyone moves on.

        • HeartyBeast@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          You and I obviously have no idea what happened at the security gate, or the extent to which she tried to argue about it or hide it. I’ve travelled in and made mistakes in the past and the result was a stern ticking off. I suspect there was more to this.

        • Selmafudd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          41
          ·
          1 year ago

          Us crazy black and white maniacs is why Australia doesn’t get to enjoy the wide array of pest and dieses the rest of the world has.

          Fuck this gandma and her chicken burger. Entitled people like her are actually what’s wrong with society.

              • nixcamic@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                18
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yes I called the people who charged a grandma $2000 for accidentally bringing a sandwich that has zero chance of carrying avian influenza dicks. Why you’re choosing to take that personally is beyond me.

      • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        If you can’t tell the difference between raw chicken breast and a piece of fried chicken on sight, please don’t ever work anywhere near the food industry.

        • Selmafudd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          If you don’t know chicken can look cooked on the outside but be raw on the inside please don’t ever work anywhere near the food industry.

          • darkdemize@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            Who the fuck is smuggling half-cooked chicken breasts for this ‘gotcha’ of yours? Oh, that’s right, no one.

            • Selmafudd@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              You understand most of risk DAFF is trying to mitigate is accidentally introduction of pests and dieses right?

              And I can’t fathom how so many people think customs have the man power to check every hamburger passagers may be inclined to hide in their luggage. Unknown and unprocessed meat is a risk, cheapest and safest way to reduce the risk is to ban it.

              But you know, you guys continue to enjoy your airplane hamburgers along with rabies, brown marmorated stink bugs, khapra beetles, giant african snails and all the other shit we manage to keep out with strict quarantine laws.

              • Maalus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Okay, it is banned. Tell them to throw it away. Don’t fine the everliving shit out of them for a cooked sandwich.

                • meathorse@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s generally the rule - if you’re not sure, declare it, then if it’s not allowed, it’s binned. There are even signs all over the place through Aus (& NZ) customs saying exactly this.

                  If you don’t declare it and it’s found or it looks like you’ve tried to hide it (wrapped in luggage) then that’s when you get in trouble for it.

                • Selmafudd@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I’ve worked in imports for 20 odd years and would have witnessed ABF & DAFF (and their previous 5 or 6 names) seize or hold hundreds of thousands of items. I’ve never seen a fine issued for a simple mistake, they’re normally reserved for when there is deceit or concealment.

              • jimbo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Unknown and unprocessed meat is a risk

                A risk of what? And why would that risk not apply to the people coming in who’ve been eating that meat?

                rabies, brown marmorated stink bugs, khapra beetles, giant african snails

                All things that are not typically found in chicken sandwiches…

  • stifle867@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    “Chicken meat poses a significant biosecurity risk to Australia, particularly the risk of highly pathogenic notifiable avian influenza (HPNAI) virus which can cause severe disease and mortality across Australia’s poultry industry, and may also affect wild bird populations.”

    We do have a reputation for taking these things very seriously, as we should. We were even going to kill Johnny Depp’s dogs at one point but settled for the “hostage video”. Despite that, it does seem excessive in this case and should have been overturned on appeal at the very least.

    Thankfully someone stepped up and ended up paying the fine on their behalf.

    • interceder270@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 year ago

      We were even going to kill Johnny Depp’s dogs at one point but settled for the “hostage video”.

      Let me guess, it’s because he was rich and famous.

      • stifle867@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think it was more about sending a message. In a way yes because he is famous, but in the way that they wanted to leverage that as a deterrence. It wasn’t about “letting him off the hook”. It was about using him as a platform to say to the world “we do not fuck around when it comes to this”. If you’ve seen the hostage video you know what I mean 🤣

            • interceder270@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Thank you!

              I can see how this might be a win-win for both parties. Yeah, JDepp gets off cause of his fame. But the AU government also gets to use that fame to send a message to everyone else.

              • stifle867@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                They were never really going to kill the dogs. The full context was along the lines of “well you can do the right thing, or we will have no choice but to…”. I’m not aware of any cases where they’ve actually euthanised a pet, famous or no. It’s an absolute last resort as they would rather just quarantine them. But yeah, pretty funny and a win for the government.

      • Quokka@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        In Australia under a rightwing government? No, they wouldn’t have given a shit about that.

        It was because he broke biosecurity laws. Something we take seriously here after witnessing how rabbits, foxes, and canetoads fucked up the environment.

    • rainynight65@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      We were even going to kill Johnny Depp’s dogs at one point but settled for the “hostage video”.

      That was just Barnaby Joyce grandstanding and making a big deal out of ‘we apply the rules to everyone, no matter if they’re rich or famous’. No fucking way he would have ever laid hands on those dogs. The man was and still is a fucking embarrassment to politics and Australia.

      • stifle867@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Agreed and I made a similar point in a few of my other comments. If you look at the original context it was more of a “well you have to abide by the rules and the dogs should be quarantined but if you’re not willing to do that then we would have no other option”.

      • stifle867@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        And what I got from other commenters is that their countries hate pieces of gum and shrivelled blackened oranges. It’s not unique to Australia although as an island nation especially prone to biosecurity threats we do have a reputation for taking it more seriously. It’s not a difficult thing to get caught with if you’re paying any sort of attention. You can make mistakes and accidentally (or even purposefully) bring stuff in as long as you own up to it. There’s signage everywhere explaining in words and pictures what is and is not allowed. The custom agents ask you. There’s literally every chance to declare.

        It’s not as harsh as it sounds, it’s only when you get caught that it becomes a big deal. It’s like if you got pulled up by the cops. If you try and lie or simply don’t even recognise that you were speeding you’ll probably get a ticket. The analogy breaks down in the “admit fault” side of things because the cop can ticket you anyway, where under our biosecurity law you cannot be punished for declaring goods that would not be allowed in.

        • barsoap@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Yep no meat no dairy. Which also applies to the UK, yet another Brexit dividend.

          The chance that any random sandwich carries something nasty is small, but there’s two other factors: a) If it does carry something nasty, the implications are huge and, certainly not least, b) you don’t need to bring a sandwich. Noone needs to bring a sandwich. Get one once you arrive. And if you just can’t stand airline food then be vegan for a couple of hours it won’t kill you. Live solely off chocolate during your flight if you want.

  • Nihilore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s a chicken burger in the picture, love when there’s an article about aus/nz but using American nomenclature

    • Pulptastic@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Burger is ground meat and chicken sandwiches are often made of whole meat. Cheapo ones are mechanically separated which would count as ground, but the one in the photo is not.

      • Nihilore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Over here if it’s on a bun it’s a burger, if it’s on sliced bread it’s a sandwich, simple as

        • Pulptastic@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          A Cuban sandwich is on a bun, is that a burger? Same goes for cheese steaks and French dips and subs, served on buns, is burger?

        • grayman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          What about sandwiches made with rolls and bagels?

          Also, I see the aussie point, but, in the US, burger is short for hamburger, which refers to the meat itself. Do you only say ground beef too? Or is ground beef also called hamburger?

          And also… Is a burger not considered a type of sandwich?

          I hadn’t heard of this dialect difference. Fun stuff!

          • brisk@aussie.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            The meat is beef mince or minced beef (not ground). It’s formed into and cooked as a patty, which is one component of a delicious hamburger.

            I think most people would say yes to “is a burger a type of sandwich” but that’s a very different question to would you call a burger a sandwich, which an Aussie would not.

          • Nihilore@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 year ago

            A roll is a roll and a bagel is a bagel, a sub is a sub, they’re not really called sandwiches here unless it’s on sliced bread

          • rainynight65@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            A bagel is a bagel. Two halves of a bagel with something on between are still a bagel. The same goes for a roll. A sandwich is two slices of bread with something in between.

  • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    1 year ago

    The link didn’t load for me, but this link has an interesting bit at the end-

    “Meat has strict import conditions which can change quickly based on disease outbreaks,” the spokesperson said, adding that passengers can be fined up to 6,260 Australian dollars, or around $4,100, for bringing unauthorized food items into the country.

    It’s not the first time a passenger has been fined for bringing an undeclared item through an Australian airport. In August, a passenger was fined $1,200 for walking with a rose at an airport in Australia. And in August last year, a passenger was fined $1,870 for packing McMuffin sandwiches on a flight from Bali to Australia.

    https://www.businessinsider.com/australia-airport-food-fine-passenger-sandwich-passenger-pension-2023-11

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        Apparently someone who doesn’t want Australia to fine them. The real question is why Australia doesn’t let people know this before they enter the country when the TSA easily lets people know about all the things they can’t bring on a plane with signs before they even go through a security checkpoint.

        • stifle867@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          We do. There’s announcements on the flight and there’s signs everywhere.

          The department spokeswoman pointed to biosecurity announcements on flights which told travellers what their declaration obligations were, as well as signage about it around arrivals areas in Australian airports.

            • stifle867@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              It was probably a lack of attention combined with a genuine mistake. She claims she slept through the flight. Lots of people are also unaware how strictly we deal with it and think they’ll be fine instead of fined. We have an entire TV show about it.

              I don’t want to be too harsh on her as it’s relatively minor and the fine amounted to 10% of their combined remaining life savings. It was her mistake.

              • Marin_Rider@aussie.zone
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                there are signs all through the airport and she will be asked as well. she had opportunities to declare it

            • Railison@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Moreover, she declared on her landing card that she had no plant or animal material on her possession. Being a New Zealander she should know better. What an idiot.

        • evranch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          Some of these rules are just silly and arbitrary. Once I was driving down to the USA from Canada and I had a banana sitting on the dash for a snack.

          The customs agent angrily tells me “You can’t bring a banana into America”. So I chomped down the banana, and offered the peel for disposal.

          “I don’t want the peel, you can keep the peel”

          I looked confused and asked how the peel was any different from the whole banana, and he’s just like “move along, next vehicle”

          I think he was just hungry and wanted to swipe my banana

          • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldM
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            1 year ago

            My father visited the USSR in the late 80s. When he left, he was required by law to return all of the Soviet money he had exchanged. He offered all of his rubles and then he emptied his pockets and he had a handful of kopeks in them and put them on the desk. The customs guy looked down at them and said, “you keep kopek.” And that’s how I got a few Soviet kopeks as a kid to add to my coin collection.

      • WashedOver
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        At the US Canada border crossing, if you don’t declare a pack of gum or a candy bar for a inspection it can be used as an “issue”

        I was warned of this a few years ago as they asked me if I wanted to declare anything before they started their random vehicle inspection.

        One time I was driving my Gf’s car and at some point a orange had rolled under her seat and had turned into a dried out black ball.

        They let me off with a stiff warning that I was lucky since I didn’t declare and they could tell it was an accident. They have to be concerned about the orange crops (in Florida I guess?) I was told. I was crossing in Washington State though.

  • cantrips@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Same thing happened to me with a Tim Hortons bagel. Border guards with small dicks having a power trip. The best part? The question on the computer was “are you importing any xyz…”. I was not importing it, I was eating it at the airport. Still had my Nexus taken.

  • Additional_Prune@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I remember flying back from Spain one time and a young woman behind me in line to clear customs had two Spanish sausages, long ones, on top of her luggage. They were a no-no. Clearly, she did not give a fuck. Customs let her through.