• o2inhaler
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would argue happiness is profitable, but would have to shared amongst the people. Killer robots are profitable for a concentrated group of people

      • Meowing Thing@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        What if we gave everyone their own killer robot and then everyone could just fight each other for what they wanted?

          • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            No the Republican plan would be to sell killer robots at a vastly inflated price to guarantee none but the rich can own them, and then blame people for “being lazy” when they can’t afford their own killer robot.

            • TopRamenBinLaden@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Also, they would say that the second amendment very obviously covers killer robots. The founding fathers definitely foresaw the AI revolution, and wanted to give every man and woman the right to bear killer robots.

            • winterayars@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              They’d say they’re gonna pass a law to give every male, property owning citizen a killer robot but first they have to pass a law saying it’s legal to own killer robots. They pass that law then all talk about the other law is dropped forever. No one ever follows up or asks what happened to it. Meanwhile, the rich buy millions and millions of killer robots.