Hello,

I am using qbittorrent for torrenting and my ISP has refused to open up firewall because of fucking “security” reasons. however I can still seed the torrent how is that possible? I mean all the incoming connections should be blocked right? isn’t it how firewall works?

  • whoareuOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    no they have firewall enabled on their side so even if I use my own router it won’t do much.

          • Baggins [he/him]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            ·
            5 months ago

            Does OP really know exactly what technology at his ISP is preventing him from “opening ports”?

            • Grippler@feddit.dk
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Maybe not, but you and I definitely dont, so let’s stick to what they’re actually saying instead of guessing.

              • Baggins [he/him]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                You commented that it’s “super weird and invasive” for an ISP to “firewall” listening ports. It just so happens that CGNAT also has the same effect and is super commonly used right now.

                I think I’m good 👍

            • whoareuOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 months ago

              Yes I know what’s preventing me from opening ports. I also called my ISP they said we can’t open the firewall so the incoming connections will be blocked.

        • whoareuOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          5 months ago

          It’s definitely not CGNAT. I have tested it using traceroute.

      • bier@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        5 months ago

        Ipv4 shortage lead to a lot of IPS adopting CG-NATs where they are sharing one exit IPv4 for multiple end users and that’s why opening a port on the end user side won’t do a thing as your just opening a port in the ISP Network and not to the Internet

      • lemmyingly@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        Who says the ISP isn’t blocking ports via a firewall?

        I thought it was common practice for ISPs to block certain ports for residential connections?

        • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          5 months ago

          They will usually block port 25 so you can’t run a mail server. It’s unusual for an ISP to block everything unless you are on CGNAT.