• CileTheSane
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    So the comment is silly and you argue about its interpretation. In other words it did not add anything productive to the conversation?

    When I see someone with vague complaints about downvotes and no specific elaboration when pressed, that’s a warning sign that they likely weren’t engaging in productive dialog in the first place and want to blame “the hive mind” for no one liking their “hot take”.

    If anyone was willing to engage the writer rather than just burying the comment then it’s possible you may have seen that.

    Not the responsibility of everyone else to try to engage to see if a commenter has a relevant taking point and coax it out of them. It’s up to the commenter to make that clear in the first place.

    • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Yes, some jokes are silly and that’s why they’re funny. Although jokes can be harmful, I don’t think that this one was.

      Are jokes productive for discussion or discourse? Not necessarily, but I’m not so precious that I’m going to downvote someone for making one.

      I mean what’s more likely here, a guy made a joke and a load of sensitive Lemmings downvoted them or a guy was literally comparing people that support Palestine with bigots?

      I endorse the use of /s so that we can avoid this type of debate, but whenever you mention it you get a load of complaints.