• doctordevice
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    5 months ago

    Oh, gotcha. So bullying people who don’t pass your litmus test (whether or not they actually believe or are what you claim) until they leave isn’t silencing the voices of people who disagree with you.

      • doctordevice
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 months ago

        Labeling people “bad actors” simply for expressing an opinion counter to yours and then trying to run them out is 100% bullying. You are not the arbiter of what people are allowed to think.

        • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 months ago

          I’ve seen from comments in this post that you yourself don’t like having words put in your mouth, yet here you are doing it to me.

          People here to sway an election by trying to convince people not to vote?

          Yeah. They’re bad actors. There’s other words for them, but I’d rather not get banned. -and contrary to your assumptions… It has NOTHING to do with their opinions being counter to mine. I could care less what their opinion were if their opinions were organic and relevant. But NONE of them are here to discuss anything in good faith. The moment you challenge their bullshit, they either ignorantly accuse you of ad hominem- or they shut all over the discussion to derail the topic.

          This isn’t day one of this shit man. It’s been going on plenty long enough to accurately gauge what they’re up to.

          They don’t belong here. So… calling them out for what they are with the hope that their message falls flat is absolutely necessary. If they get bored and leave…

          That’s a bonus.

          • doctordevice
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            4
            ·
            5 months ago

            What words did I put in your mouth? You called them bad actors again even in this reply and in your first one you advocated for pushing them off of Lemmy. The rest of the comment you just replied to were my words (“bullying” and “you are not the arbiter of what people are allowed to think”).

            Is it the last one you’re complaining about? That’s not me putting words into your mouth, that’s me calling out what you’re advocating for. You are advocating for pushing people off of a social media platform when YOU have decided to label them a “bad actor” without actually knowing their intentions. Your entire premise seems to me to be predicated on the idea that no one could possibly be so disillusioned, disenfranchised, and dissatisfied with the system that they go on social media and state those feelings. Therefore, anyone saying that MUST be a bad actor.

            • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              disagree with the party line your voice must be silenced."

              I never said that. Leaving this platform is isn’t silencing anyone. It’s just making bad faith trolls leave a platform. It’s a win for everyone.

              And since I know your kind tend to assume things that aren’t said: I’m not saying don’t vote.

              What is “my kind” here? Apparently you like to assume things about people you don’t know. I’ve never spoken with you before. So how do you k ow about my “kind?” Seems very… putting not just words in my mouth, but an entire personality as well.

              Oh, gotcha. So bullying people who don’t pass your litmus test (whether or not they actually believe or are what you claim) until they leave _isn’t_ silencing the voices of people who disagree with you.

              I ask you… who am I bullying? People who are yelling at other so not vote during a very important election? What the litmus test you’re assuming I have here. Since you like to make impatiens about what others say and do…

              Labeling people “bad actors” simply for expressing an opinion counter to yours

              If you look back through this conversation, I never once labeled anyone a bad actor because they expressed an opinion counter to mine or anything.

              I called them bad actors because they’re here to disrupt an election and cause fuck tons of damage to this country.

              That you’re making such an effort to defend them says a lot about you.

              • doctordevice
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                5 months ago

                Not gonna retread the entire conversation on the points you decided to stick your head back in the sand for. But on “your kind,” it’s the people who go around spreading vitriol at anyone who expresses an opinion counter to your own. And you immediately proved me right in your response by assuming the worst intention for me stating that I’m voting.

                I’m not defending anyone, I’m standing against your call for authoritarianism. Because plenty of people are completely genuine in their disillusionment with the system but your characterization of them as “bad actors” is based solely on them saying one specific thing (that’s the litmus test).

                Again: we do not need more authoritarianism. We need honest discussion of ALL of the flaws of our political system. The Democrats are not above criticism, no matter how batshit insane the Republicans get.

                • JimSamtanko@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  5 months ago

                  Im going to say this one last time since you seems to be having trouble:

                  It isn’t because it’s an opinion counter to my own. It’s because they’re wittingly or unwittingly going to cause a lot of damage to America and Americans over a single issue that’s so nuanced, they don’t understand how it even works or what it’s happening.

                  This isn’t an opinion. This isn’t authoritarianism. It’s simply trying to protect democracy.

                  Red Project 2025. Understand what will happen to our LGBTQ+ friends and family. Understand what will happen to our moms, our sisters…. Our daughters. Understand what will happen tou your protect rights.

                  Democrat is at stake and this is no time to be fucking around with right-wing trolls, and bad faith posers pretending to be leftists.

                  I’m not arguing this with you any further.

                  • doctordevice
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Then I’ll say this one more time since you seem to be having trouble: that’s your opinion, and other people see what you’re doing as an existential threat to American democracy just as much as MAGA.

                    That’s the point I’ve been trying to make this whole time. Your personal opinion on the only path to protect democracy happens to involve some steps that I think will also destroy democracy. And in the meantime I think we have very little time left to stand up against the anti-democratic practices of the Democratic party, and they’re continuing to inflame extremists in the opposition to give themselves cover.

                    By the way, for someone who is constantly yelling about bad actors in a discussion of US politics, you’ve got some pretty suspicious grammar in this comment.