• BlameThePeacock
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    6 months ago

    I’m not arguing right or wrong, I’m just saying it’s technically not anti-peace.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      In the same way that North Korea has “Democratic” in the name, sure. It’s all so surface level as to be essentially meaningless. While I agree that fairness does involve some arguing of that kind of a technicality it really only serves to validate the idea that Israel is justified in any way.

      Israel wants to eradicate an entire culture and their people. They want to steal their land and are doing so with the help of major world powers. They bomb hospitals, shoot civilians, and terrorize Palestinians on the basis that they’re somehow owed that land. Hamas retaliated and now Israel is complaining by obliterating the entire country. The “peace” this lady wants is the peace for Israel to continue to do these things without retaliation. She doesn’t want peace, she wants submission.

      The mega rich are just terrified of consequences and try, every day, to get their poor behaviour and lack of humanity written into laws and precedent so that they don’t have to ever to take blame for any of the rotten shit they pull.

    • skulblaka@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sure, if you consider the complete destruction of an entire ethnic group of people to be “peace”. Can’t fight if they’re all dead. But if you truly do think that way, you are the problem and I recommend a long walk off a short pier.