• streetfestival
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    The incumbent (Tory) party in the UK has included national service in their campaign leading up to next month’s federal [edit: national] election.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c988jdxl02vo

    The proposed new scheme would not be conscription, where people are legally required to join the armed forces for a period. But it would compel people by law to complete a community programme over a 12-month period, or enrol in a year-long military training scheme, when they turn 18.

    • bionicjoey
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yeah the article mentions that. And it mentions some conservative newspapers here are supporting the UK tories. But is anybody seriously talking about it for here?

      • floofloofOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        I hope not, but conservative bad ideas do seem highly contagious.

    • Z3k3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 months ago

      Sorry to be that guy but it’s just too jarring to me

      We don’t have federal elections it’s a general election.

      • streetfestival
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Apologies, corrected to national. More importantly, how do you feel about the incumbent party in your country planning to introduce soft conscription?

        • Z3k3@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          6 months ago

          I don’t think conscription is really the way to go. Make people do a thing they don’t want to do then hand them a gun makes me nervous.

          Besides how is he paying for it pretty sure the military is one of those things they constantly want to make more “efficient”