• soba
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    27 days ago

    And despite all your lame denials they are shutting that voice down. Why is that?

    • just another dev@lemmy.my-box.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      27 days ago

      Because lawsuits are expensive, even when you’re not guilty.

      I don’t think they’d be stupid enough to lie about hiring a voice actress for a voice model when they didn’t.

    • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      27 days ago

      I guess every out of court settlement is an admission of guilt in your eyes? It’s nothing to do with the massive amount of money wasted dealing with legal matters or anything.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        27 days ago

        The court of public opinion has a much lower burden of proof than the court of law.

        • stephen01king@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          26 days ago

          If Scarlett Johansson is trying to accuse them of using her voice without consent, do you really think it will only end up in the court of public opinion? My point is that it might escalate to court, which OpenAI might not want to deal with. Backing down in this case is just as much of an admission of guilt as taking a settlement out of court, which is not at all.