The theory is simple: instead of buying a household item or a piece of clothing or some equipment you might use once or twice, you take it out and return it.

  • john89
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    You didn’t subscribe to those things.

    • turmacar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      So you just didn’t read the article?

      One person hired a metal detector to hunt down the wedding ring they lost when camping in Sussex and found it within 20 minutes. Another rented a planer at £11 a day to fix two doors in her flat

      A handheld pressure washer is £12 a day, while garden shears are £3.50

      Renting is the “subscription” you’re complaining about. You’re right that rent-to-own is a scam at best, but unlike most digital subscriptions you’re using the thing to do something. Like with all rentals there’s a break even line where you would’ve been better buying the thing if you use it often/long enough. But the service existing is not itself a bad thing.

      • john89
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        It’s not nearly as bad as it is now.

        And it was always a scam, even back then.