Dave Duttlinger’s first thought when he saw a dense band of yellowish-brown dust smearing the sky above his Indiana farm was: I warned them this would happen. About 445 acres of his fields near Wheatfield, Indiana, are covered in solar panels and related machinery – land that in April 2019 Duttlinger leased to Dunns Bridge Solar LLC, for one of the largest solar developments in the Midwest.

On that blustery spring afternoon in 2022, Duttlinger said, his phone rang with questions from frustrated neighbors: Why is dust from your farm inside my truck? Inside my house? Who should I call to clean it up?

According to Duttlinger’s solar lease, reviewed by Reuters, Dunns Bridge said it would use “commercially reasonable efforts to minimize any damage to and disturbance of growing crops and crop land caused by its construction activities” outside the project site and “not remove topsoil” from the property itself. Still, sub-contractors graded Duttlinger’s fields to assist the building of roads and installation of posts and panels, he said, despite his warnings that it could make the land more vulnerable to erosion.

“I’ll never be able to grow anything on that field again,” the farmer said. About one-third of his approximately 1,200-acre farm – where his family grows corn, soybeans and alfalfa for cattle – has been leased.

  • @girlfreddyOP
    link
    -7
    edit-2
    15 days ago

    When the topsoil blows away, what’s left?

    edit – No, really. What’s left?

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      1615 days ago

      I never remember hearing any complaints about the construction for fracking installations. Which, where I’m at, it’s just about every farm.

    • @[email protected]
      link
      fedilink
      615 days ago

      But that has nothing to do with the solar power and more to do with the construction company that did the work in a way the farmer didn’t like. This article is just a small land dispute wrapped up as propaganda that solar panels are somehow always bad for farmers.

      Solar panels do not require the removal of top soil.

    • Benjamin
      link
      fedilink
      English
      215 days ago

      Dead dirt. No nutrients. Would be like you trying to eat the dirt, to the plants you try to plant.

      Useless, gritty, and harmful.

      • @girlfreddyOP
        link
        115 days ago

        No, not “dead” dirt. Usually what’s left is the clay (called lodgement till) from when the last monster glaciers receded from much of North America. And that is shit soil to try and grow anything in because it’s essentially various sizes of ground up rock (ranging in size from boulders to fine dust).