• apprehensively_human
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    8 months ago

    Bikes belong on roads that are built for vehicular traffic.

    Bikes belong on roads that are built for bikes.

      • Tangentism@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        https://roadswerenotbuiltforcars.com

        Roads existed before cars & it was cycling organisations that campaigned to have them tarmacked & sealed for everyone’s benefit

        Pavements were not built for vehicles yet in the UK over 350 people are killed or seriously injured by vehicles mounting it.

      • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Roads for cars are built almost exclussively for just cars. Its half the reason this community even exists. Roads speced for bikes wouldn’t need to tolerate nearly as much weight nor would they need to be as wide as car lanes. Many intersections would also be served with yields rather than traffic lights as most bike traffic can negotiate intersections easily.

        • delirious_owl@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          That type of logic is why I prefer roads to bike trails.

          Motorcycles need the full width of a road, so do bicycles. When engineers lower the specs for bicycles, they are thinking of a child riding 5 kph on a Sunday rec ride, but we need roads designed for cargo bikes hauling a weeks worth of groceries or rebar and cement down hill at 40 kph.

          When you make the lanes smaller or don’t clean the land of debris or permit sharper turns, you endanger the lives of cyclists. That’s not OK. Cyclists are vehicles and our roads should meet the same specs as all roads.

          • FireRetardant@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Technically speaking. Motorcycle do not need the full width. It is not uncommon to see them side by side in a single lane.

            If your bike max speed is 40kph, thats the slower side of car speeds so the roads could still be designed far differently for bikes.

            • delirious_owl@discuss.online
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              8 months ago

              Legally and saftey wise, motorcycles absolutely need the full width of the lane.

              Some motorcyclists ride dangerously. Who knew?

              But the motorcyclists uses all 3 thirds of the lane for different purposes. Another vehicle should never enter their lane, for their safety. Same with bicyclists.

        • delirious_owl@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I have. And on the Autobahn in Germany.

          They need to put a green stripe in the right most lanes and say that cars are not allowed in that lane, except for exiting. With extreme speed restrictions.