no banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 7 months agoToday's lunchlemmy.worldimagemessage-square7fedilinkarrow-up1243arrow-down16
arrow-up1237arrow-down1imageToday's lunchlemmy.worldno banana@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 7 months agomessage-square7fedilink
minus-squareremotelovelinkfedilinkarrow-up18·edit-27 months agoWhat is the comparison here? If both objects are in cold and dry conditions, I wouldn’t expect any less. If they had unwrapped the cigarette butt to expose the filter, it might have been a better representation of their point? Maybe it’s just a promotional cigarette ad for frogs? Math problem? frog + cigarette = frogarette? Yeah… I dunno.
What is the comparison here? If both objects are in cold and dry conditions, I wouldn’t expect any less.
If they had unwrapped the cigarette butt to expose the filter, it might have been a better representation of their point?
Maybe it’s just a promotional cigarette ad for frogs? Math problem? frog + cigarette = frogarette? Yeah… I dunno.