• Beaver
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        33
        ·
        2 months ago

        The doe is a being not an object.

        • Ookami38@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          The doe has no concept of pronouns. I promise calling it “it” isn’t doing anything to hurt it.

        • emptiestplace@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          As someone who has been vegan for 25 years, I really appreciate your choices and empathize with your motivations. If, however, your goal is to make a difference, you might want to avoid alienating your audience before you’ve even said anything.

          • Beaver
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            23
            ·
            2 months ago

            You wouldn’t call people “it”. It’s about showing respect.

            • ManniSturgis@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              14
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I wouldn’t, but I am calling animals it. Only in English tho, we don’t do that in my native language.

            • UnearthedUnusual@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              I know a few people who use it/its pronouns. While I agree that treating animals with respect is a good thing, it pronouns are not necessarily a sign of disrespect or objectification.

              • Beaver
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                13
                ·
                2 months ago

                Well in that case that is different but usually when we say “it” that is used to refer to physical objects like book or treat. Animals being seen as property harms them.

                • intensely_human@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  9
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  No, because people can be respectful of animals while using the word “it”.

                  You’re asserting all this extra stuff that the word does not convey, because you’ve unconsciously decided that is the only way to use the word.

                  But as others are telling you, and is true, it is common in English to use “it” for animals. Despite what your lit teacher told you, that does not create disrespect for the animals. People have been caring for animals, people with hearts, people who don’t treat animals the way they would a book, while using the word “it”, for as long as the English language had existed.

                  That thing where you can’t have empathy for an “it”, that a rule in your head.

                  • Beaver
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    9
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    People have been caring for animals, people with hearts, people who don’t treat animals the way they would a book, while using the word “it”, for as long as the English language had existed.

                    I doubt that when factory farms exist.

                    Humanity kills more than 80 billion land animals and trillions of aquatic animals ever year.

                    https://awellfedworld.org/factory-farms/

                • Nythos@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  The person getting upset at another person calling a doe an it, telling another to touch grass is just peak internet.

                  • MashBoilPitch@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    Ikr. I think were now supposed to say something about how this kind of interaction is so reddit. Loudly enough that we can ignore that it’s just how people behave in general.

            • intensely_human@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              2 months ago

              But you would immediately jump in to correct another adult’s use of language, as if they were a child. Despite this talk of respect.

                • No_@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  From the person who said “touch some grass buddy”. You cannot get more condescending or hypocritical than that. Narcissists will narcissist.

    • DrRatso@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Using “it” for an animal is perfectly reasonable. An argument can be made for using they instead but we even use it for humans occasionally (e.g. Jack checked on the baby, it was sleeping peacefully).