• BlameThePeacock
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    182
    ·
    7 months ago

    In the United States, parody is protected by the First Amendment as a form of expression.

    • Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      110
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Yuuuup, and a lot of times the people that get parodied love it. It’s like fuck me! We made it to the point where South Park makes fun of us. Only person I know of that got pissed was Kanye but fuck that guy anyways

      • MolochAlter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        87
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        The best thing is he apparently actually didn’t get the fish sticks joke which, if true, makes Parker and Stone the best satirists of all time on merits.

      • Tolstoshev@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        45
        ·
        7 months ago

        Nirvana famously said they knew they had made it when Weird Al did a parody of Smells Like Teen Spirit.

        • makyo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          7 months ago

          If I recall, Weird Al tries to get permission for all his parodies too, just further adding to the point that people mostly are good with that kind of attention.

          • Tolstoshev@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            ·
            7 months ago

            That he does. The only snafu he had was with Coolio for Gangster’s Paradise. Apparently the label said yes but didn’t actually check with Coolio and he wasn’t happy about it. Weird Al apologized for the mixup and they made peace with it later. Weird Al said the only star that has consistently turned him down was Prince, who didn’t find the whole parody thing funny.

      • MeatsOfRage@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        29
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        George Clooney liked the show so much he wanted to be on the show but they rejected his request initially since they don’t let famous people play themselves. They in turn offered him the non-speaking role of Stan’s gay dog. Clooney showed up and gave a full performance of barks.

        • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          7 months ago

          George Clooney was instrumental in getting the show made in the first place. He liked their second Christmas short so much that he made hundreds of copies and gave them to all his friends, which helped them pitch the show.

      • Delphia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        7 months ago

        And most of the ones who arent ok with it are aware of the “Streisand effect” and know that their best course of action is to either ignore it or pretend they are ok with it and wait for everyone to move on.

        • Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          7 months ago

          The Mormon church did this when the play Book of Mormon came out! Also amazing play if you have not seen it please do!!! There is a reason it won a Tony!

      • jaybone@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I have to doubt a lot of people love being parodied on that show. They are pretty harsh.

        • Pacmanlives@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          I take it you don’t have a brother or any close guy friends. It’s kind of what we do. We rip on each other and buy each other a beer. Same with competitive sports. At the end of the day we respect each other but can make fun of each other and live laugh and love

          • jaybone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            This is not like ripping on each other with your guy friends.

            And this is not like Weird Al doing a parody of one of your songs, which most musicians do see as a badge of honor.

            These are pretty damning (and accurate) personal attacks. Pretty sure j-lo, Paris Hilton and Britney Spears were not happy with their portrayal.

        • BrikoX@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          7 months ago

          In terms of parody as a whole, sure, but in cases that involve trademarks it’s huge. They completely killed the test that was set by the prior precedent case.

    • RightHandOfIkaros@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      It should be noted that that really only applies to citizens being protected from the government (and primarily was created to protect the printing presses and media from the government). There is no legal precedent to indicate that it would apply between citizens.

      • peto (he/him)@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        7 months ago

        There comes an issue when a private citizen seeks to use the engines of state to punish those whose speech offends them.

        It’s one thing to withdraw society and business from someone who offends you, quite another to demand that the state crush them for you. Of course, most states will do that to a greater or lesser degree. No state extends an absolute freedom of speech.

      • Azzu@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        But all kinds of other laws protect citizens from other citizens. You can’t hurt them, can’t slander them, etcetc so there’s really not much most people can do. The most of it is saying “they did a terrible parody of me” and not deal with them anymore.

      • BlameThePeacock
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 months ago

        That concept doesn’t really apply very well here.

        The government can’t make laws restricting speech(with very limited exceptions) therefore other citizens can’t legally go after you for protected speech. They’re allowed to tell you you’re an asshole, they’re allowed to ignore you, but they don’t have a court case.