• evranch
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    We did a ton of research when my wife first got one, I studied biochem so figured I could assess the situation fairly well.

    Non-hormonal are awful and I wouldn’t recommend them to anyone. Mirena on the other hand does release hormones, but in small enough quantity that the effects are basically topical - localized to the uterus and serum concentrations are barely affected compared to pills or shots.

    • idiomaddict@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I brain farted and thought mirena was the copper one. Thank god, I thought you were super attached to giving an eleven year old a non hormonal iud. I had a state university clinician tell me that I was a conspiracy theorist for thinking there could be scarring and straight up pressure me to let her insert it, so I assume someone out there is recommending them to people.

      • evranch
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        Yikes, I can’t imagine who would recommend copper unless someone had a bad reaction to the hormonal type. The mode of action is totally different, with hormonal suppressing the whole cycle and copper being more like a continuous abortion.

        My wife didn’t have a period for years aside from some occasional spotting with Mirena, I figure if we can save my daughter a decade of cramping and bleeding by offering her one young, the birth control is almost a happy side effect.