If this isn’t just corporate hype, this could be great for making smaller batteries, hopefully less resource intensive.

  • LimpRimble
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    If the company is able to scale this technology large enough for consumer vehicles while keeping prices down …

    • Jimmycakes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 months ago

      They probably won’t care about keeping costs down if they are developing 1300 miles range batteries that’s gonna be for industrial and military applications. Maybe some very high end consumer use.

      • NaibofTabr@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        3 months ago

        Alternatively, they could make smaller versions for consumer vehicles that take up less space/weight.

        • Cethin@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah, this kind of headline is stupid. Any battery can offer any given range if it’s large enough. This kind of thing should be written as distance/mass or, for consumer products, cost/distance.

          • nBodyProblem@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            Even that is meaningless because the vehicle you put a battery in is as important or moreso than the battery.

            Aptera has a claimed 1,000+ mile range with a 100 kWh lithium battery. Meanwhile, the Rivian R1S has a claimed 270 mile range when equipped with a 106 kWh battery.

            The main difference is that the Aptera is a light and aerodynamic car built for maximum efficiency instead of a 6,000 lb pickup truck. Any battery can boast amazing numbers if you are flexible enough with the use case.

            • Cethin@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              That’s true. I guess it should just be kWh/mass. Either that or we should have a standard vehicle all batteries are tested on for headlines if they want to talk about distance, which is obviously more understandable to the average reader.

      • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 months ago

        It will start like that, but this tech will become more and more affordable as time goes on.