The “Harry Potter” author slammed a newly enacted hate-crime law in Scotland in a series of posts on X  in which she referred to transgender women as men.

J.K. Rowling shared a social media thread on Monday, the day a new Scottish hate-crime law took effect, that misgendered several transgender women and appeared to imply trans women have a penchant for sexual predation. On Tuesday, Scottish police announced they would not be investigating the “Harry Potter” author’s remarks as a crime, as some of Rowling’s critics had called for.

“We have received complaints in relation to the social media post,” a spokesperson for Police Scotland said in a statement. “The comments are not assessed to be criminal and no further action will be taken.”

Scotland’s new Hate Crime and Public Order Act criminalizes “stirring up hatred” against people based on their race, religion, disability, sexuality or gender identity.

  • m-p{3}A
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    A law is a strong as its enforcement. Without enforcement, it’s just political posturing.

    • Fisk400@feddit.nu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      80
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      What makes laws strong is precedent and this law doesn’t have any. Her case is too flimsy and we don’t want her to set precedent since she has infinite lawyers to defend her. Its better to get more solid cases first and then go after her when there is solid precedent.

      • fuego
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        It’s better not to persecute people just because you disagree with them.

        It’s sad how you people are literally pushing for a world where someone can get arrested for not calling a trans woman a woman.

        You’re going to make way more enemies than friends with that rhetoric, trust me.

        • Fisk400@feddit.nu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Hello baby account that was created in order to comment on this thread but is also asking me to trust you.

          The bill does not say that people will be arrested for “Not calling trans women women”. it’s the fucking Jordan Peterson thing again. You need to make clear threats towards the group and calling for the group to be abused to the same standard required by individual harassment charges.

          • fuego
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            3 months ago

            So what’s the problem? She’s not making clear threats to the group or calling for them to be abused, but people in this thread still think she should be arrested.

            • Fisk400@feddit.nu
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Why do you think I want to defend the opinions of people that isn’t me? Go reply to their comments instead you weird little goblin.

              • fuego
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Why are you insulting me? Lol.

                If you don’t agree with them, then why are you commenting?

                I think you’re just upset because I don’t offer unwavering support for your agenda.

    • fuego
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Why should people get arrested for not calling others what they want to be called?

      I seriously believe most of you never matured past elementary school and that’s why you expect others to solve all your problems for you.