What is the difference between cellular data being used on my phone and cellular data being used on my notebook? Data is data.

  • m-p{3}A
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    9 months ago

    Which is bullshit. Who cares if you download something at full speed on your phone or through the hotpot? A bit is a bit, doesn’t matter where it ends up when received by the phone’s modem.

    • Zachariah@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      58
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s a sneaky way of having a bandwidth cap without having a bandwidth cap. Mobile devices have smaller storage, so you’re less likely to use as much bandwidth compared to a laptop. Also a single device going to use less data than multiple devices sharing a hotspot.

      • m-p{3}A
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        9 months ago

        Jokes on them, I have a 512GB micrSD card and I use Termux to archive videos through YT-DLP.

        • Em Adespoton
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          9 months ago

          Was just going to say… my phone has 512GB storage and can do direct WiFi file transfer to my computer without a hotspot. All without using the mobile hotspot feature.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        You can burn through a huge amount of data streaming 4K video on your phone without using any storage. You can also plug a 20TB USB hard drive into your phone, connect to a VPN and torrent away.

    • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      9 months ago

      The carrier who’s paying for your traffic. You’re most likely going to use a lot more data on a computer than actually on your phone.

        • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I mean let’s be real, it’s incredibly complex and amazing technology. Borderline magic. And depending on where you are, yeah consistently using large amounts of bandwidth can and will impact other users.

          So a policy like this makes sense, to a point. It’s when they auto charge you for hitting a “limit” that grinds my gears.

          • brbposting@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            And I’m sure we can all acknowledge what would happen to prices if there were zero restrictions. A top budget blogger tip would be “stop paying for your expensive broadband service! Plug your phone in and tap “hotspot” in settings to save $50-$100 a month.“

            Normies (grandmas using Facebook, not WFHers/gamers) would be frivolous to pay for two “equivalent” Internet services.

            (Before you think me a corporate lobbyist, know I submitted a complaint to the FCC when Comcast first implemented broadband bandwidth caps in the USA. Saw that BS in Canada.)