• IninewCrow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    56
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    9 months ago

    Brave woman … if American history serves me right, people like her are liable to get themselves killed or conveniently die for speaking up too much or too loudly

    • NoLifeGaming@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      AOC has been mostly silent and very “soft” on the matter until recently. Better late than never I guess.

    • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Brave? This has been going on for 5+ months and she is just now saying something.

      Edit: My apologies, I am angry that she hasn’t called it a genocide.

      • Maggoty@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        9 months ago

        This is not her first time speaking about it. She called for a cease fire on October 9th. So a pretty consistent position.

        • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          There is not. So she is the first and only of the 435.

          Doesn’t take away that it took her 5 months to call it that when it was obvious that it was a genocide at a much earlier date.

        • jkrtn@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          Let’s not whatabout them. If she had been turning a blind eye to it I think their comments would be justified regardless of how trash the rest of Congress is or is not. This person is just flat-out wrong, though, she did not wait 5 months to say something.

      • stembolts@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        Ah, can you share an example of someone who has been saying something in the interim? That way you could highlight a politician we should be paying attention to who is doing a better job.

        Also, is there logic behind your five month cutoff because I’d love to get some insight the rationale behind the opinion.

        • DAMunzy@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          No, I am addressing AOC here and not anyone else.

          My (corrected) point is that it took her 5 months to call it a genocide. That is the point. It was obvious way before that.

    • SpaceCowboy
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      21
      ·
      9 months ago

      If American history serves me right people will be paranoid over whatever they’re told to be paranoid.

      She’s actually more likely to be killed by a pro-palestine protester given how emotionally unstable the Hamas propaganda is making them. She’s already being harassed in the streets by them.

        • SpaceCowboy
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          18
          ·
          9 months ago

          You first. You’re getting paranoid about the evil Jews assassinating a US politician.

          If you don’t think the internet makes people emotionally unstable and you don’t think emotionally unstable people do crazy things, it may be because the internet has put you into an emotionally unstable state. Go outside and touch grass. Eventually Hamas will be forced to release the hostages one way or another and the death will stop. Civilian casualties in a war should be upsetting but understand there isn’t anything you can do about it. Falsely claiming genocide and trying to make a war drag on longer by cutting off supplies only makes things worse. It’s not going to end until the hostages are freed.

            • SpaceCowboy
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              10
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yeah Hamas are psychopaths so they wouldn’t have any qualms about murdering hostages. But also they’re psychopaths and whatever they might say about wanting to be martyrs is just lies. A psychopaths will prioritize their own self preservation over anything else. Obviosuly they’re willing to put the Palestinian people at the mercy of an army they claim to be committing genocide while they hide underground like cowards.

              But it’s possible they could release the hostages and make an exit through Egypt and survive. The question is how many Palestinian civilians they can let die (civilian deaths is a big money maker for them) before they make their escape to Qatar to live a life of luxury. It’s important to put a lot of pressure on Rafah by making it clear that the IDF is willing to fight in Rafah to force them into running away. The leadership of Hamas are cowards we know this by their actions so far. A strong showing of support for Israel will reveal the nature of Hamas (if October 7 didn’t already) and could result in a long term peace. But the effectiveness of Hamas’ propaganda on the west makes it more likely Hamas will continue their psychotic ways and this conflict will go on for another generation.