• Mongostein
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    Using this as a reason to be able to drive high is a weird take

    • Bone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s your only take? I never even mentioned driving while high. I did mention a lot of other hassles however. No take on them?

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        “This woman died while driving drunk. Meanwhile, I have to go through hurdles to smoke weed. See, I haven’t driven into any ponds!”

        It’s a weird sentence overall, actually.

        • Bone@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Weird, but not that weird. I’m being treated like a second-class citizen over marijuana. You’d even have to look high and low to find the dangers. Maybe this woman should have had to go through security doors everytime she bought alcohol, teach her how to behave, along with the countless other drunks that kill people on the road. Be glad it was just a pond this time. It’s not the stoners with bad attitudes fucking shit up.

          • El Barto@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            You’re going through the best red-herring argument I’ve seen in a while. The topic is a woman was dead because of drunk driving, and here you are saying “but my pot!!!”