• PeriodicallyPedantic
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Honestly I kinda feel like an annular eclipse is prettier, but I’m still excited just for the rarity of the experience.

    And who am I kidding? How often do annular eclipses happen either? I’m happy that EITHER happen near me lol

    Edit 3 weeks later, after the eclipse: I take it all back - the difference between a sliver of visible sun, and totality, is worlds apart. It’s a totally different beast. It’s in a different league. It doesn’t seem like a big deal on camera, but in person it’s incomparable.

    • stoneparchment@possumpat.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      9 months ago

      pictures cannot capture the ephemeral, indescribable beauty of the moments of totality

      total eclipse wins every time

      get effin HYPE

      • Grayox@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        It is really the most magical experience a human can experience without drugs.

      • PeriodicallyPedantic
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Annular eclipse isn’t a partial eclipse. It’s just like a total eclipse, but with a frickin ring of fire. How frickin metal is that?!?!

        But I’d get hype for either, honestly.

        • stoneparchment@possumpat.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          that is pretty metal and sick, you’re right

          the tradeoff is that the ring of fire means you can’t look directly at it even at peak totality…

          but either is so friggin hype

    • GreyEyedGhost
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      I traveled to see the annular eclipse in October, and I’m traveling to the path of the total eclipse next month. I’m sure they both will be amazing experiences. My last total eclipse is decades ago.

      In short, I disagree with this meme.

    • PunnyName@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      Annular are more common. And you can’t look at them without solar glasses. Total you can look for the few minutes without glasses.

      • GreyEyedGhost
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 months ago

        According to Wikipedia, and data for the last century, there were 73 annular and 71 total eclipses, which is pretty close to the same. List of 20th century eclipses. Now, I haven’t checked to see if there are more of one than the other in the eclipse cycle, but given the difference of 2 over a century and the cycle taking 18 years, it can’t be more than one.

        But see them while you can. In the distant future, there won’t be any total eclipses.

      • idiomaddict@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        You still shouldn’t look at them unprotected, because you don’t notice the damage until it’s too late, iirc

        • PunnyName@lemmy.worldOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          For a total, it’s fine as long as you ONLY look during actual totality. Once you see the Bailey’s Beads (little diamonds at the edge), you need to put on your glasses.