I know that Lemmy is open source and it can only get better from here on out, but I do wonder if any experts can weigh in whether the foundation is well written? Or are we building on top of 4 years worth of tech debt?

  • tarjeezy
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 year ago

    From some comments I’ve read, it’s at least in better shape than kbin? A few people expressed interest in helping with that project and then went running for the hills after reading through the code.

      • platypus_plumba@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Mother. Of. God. Did they really write Kbin in PHP?

        I may be talking shit because I’m not a PHP coder, but the times I’ve seen it, it was a nightmare.

        • DrWorm@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Which… makes sense. The creator of doesn’t like coding.

          I actually hate programming, but I love solving problems. I really don’t like programming. I built this tool to program less so that I could just reuse code. PHP is about as exciting as your toothbrush.

          So PHP it born out of a dislike of coding. In turn the documentation is all over the place and inconsistent.

          • whoisearth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Makes sense. And JavaScript is born out of a dislike of coders🤣

          • ritswd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            It has become really solid over time.

            But it will always be a mono-threaded and interpreted technology, and therefore never a good choice for a high-scale solution like a Fediverse application.

      • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        PHP is really old isn’t it? I remember using phpBB forums some twenty years ago. They worked really well, but that’s going pretty far back.

        • ritswd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It is, but it aged pretty well.

          Devs wanted to store state in objects, so it became object-oriented. It also gained a really solid full-fledged web framework with a strong community, with Symfony; and some strong micro-frameworks like Laravel.

          But it will always be interpreted and mono-threaded, and therefore never a good choice for high-scale solutions. Facebook has to invent a brand new language (Hack) and runtime (HHVM) that was close enough to PHP so they could spend millions spending their PHP codebase to it, in order to make it compiled and multi-threaded, and make it scale.

        • insomniac@vlemmy.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          PHP is an interpreted language which is inherently slow compared to a compiled language, such as Rust which is very fast. Modern PHP isn’t so bad kinda but I’m guessing a guy who hates programming and decided to start a new PHP project in 2023 isn’t really optimizing anything. Also, you’ll never get anyone you help you write PHP because gross. It’s a dead language with a small community of masochists and maintainers of legacy projects.

          It would be like if you saw someone building a fighter jet and thought “hey, I can do better!” and then started getting your paper mache out to start playing air plane designer.

    • rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I read from one admin that a Lemmy instance is a lot easier to set up and maintain than a kbin instance. It’s initially more complicated to set up and updates are just a super headache to deal with. That sounds like a showstopper. I mean kbin is not going to get too far if it’s that difficult to run and maintain an instance, no matter how good or bad the code.

      From a user perspective kbin has a really nice looking interface, though Lemmy has more features. I’d like to see kbin do well. It’s younger than Lemmy so it’s going to be behind, but hopefully the overhead in running an instance can be resolved.