The New York Times is one of the newspapers of record for the United States. However, it’s history of running stories with poor sourcing, insufficient evidence, and finding journalists with conflicts of interest undermines it’s credibility when reporting on international issues and matters of foreign policy.

Late last year, the NYT ran a story titled ‘Screams Without Words’: How Hamas Weaponized Sexual Violence on Oct. 7. Recently, outlets like The Intercept, Jacobin, Democracy Now! , Mondoweiss, and others have revealed the implicit and explicit bias against Palestine that’s apparent both in the aforementioned NYT story and in the NYT’s reporting at large. By obfuscating poor sources, running stories without evidence, and using an ex-IDF officer with no journalism experience as the author, the NYT demonstrates their disregard for common journalistic practice. This has led to inaccurate and demonstrably false reporting on critical issues in today’s world, which has been used to justify the lack of American pressure against Israel to the American public.

This journalistic malpractice is not unusual from the NYT. One of the keystone stories since the turn of the century was the NYT’s reporting on Iraq’s pursuit of WMDs: U.S. SAYS HUSSEIN INTENSIFIES QUEST FOR A-BOMB PARTS, Defectors Bolster U.S. Case Against Iraq, Officials Say, Illicit Arms Kept Till Eve of War, An Iraqi Scientist Is Said to Assert. These reports were later revealed to be false, and the NYT later apologized, but not before the reporting was used as justification to launch the War on Iraq, directly leading to the deaths of hundreds of thousands and indirectly causing millions of death while also destabilizing the region for decades.

These landmark stories have had a massive influence on US foreign policy, but they’re founded on lies. While stories published in the NYT do accurately reflect foreign policy aims of the US government, they are not founded in fact. The NYT uses lies to drum up public support for otherwise unpopular foreign policy decisions. In most places, we call that “government propaganda.”

I think reading and understanding propaganda is an important element of media literacy, and so I’m not calling for the ban of NYT articles in this community. However, I am calling for an honest discussion on media literacy and it’s relation to the New York Times.

  • intelshillOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    4 months ago

    After the fact, it’s being revealed that their “sources” are consistently wrong and consistently in line with US foreign policy objectives.

    You can say it’s a coincidence, but…

      • intelshillOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        4 months ago

        These are some of the most important and impactful stories since 2000. If the NYT can’t keep their journalism robust for these, what does it say about everything else?

        Oh wait, we already know: “Palestinian family collides with bullet discharged from Israeli weapon”

        • Candelestine@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          17
          ·
          4 months ago

          Nobody and no system should be expected to be perfect all the time, I would anticipate some mistakes over a course of decades.

          Have you checked for any times they were critical of US foreign policy within the same timeframe?

          • intelshillOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            17
            arrow-down
            10
            ·
            4 months ago

            These mistakes led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands. How much more genocide apologism do you want to do?

            • carbrewr84@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              The NYT mistakes caused hundreds of thousands of deaths that you say are genocide? Please enlighten me on how this is the case because it sounds a lot like hyperbole.

              You seem to be just a pissed-off person who wants to lash out at things/people/organizations and think that if something isn’t perfectly aligned with your views, then it’s evil/bad/etc. I’d like to suggest stepping outside and taking a deep breath.

            • Candelestine@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              11
              arrow-down
              11
              ·
              4 months ago

              I don’t think the invasion of Iraq can be blamed on the NYT. I think the Bush administration and Al Qaeda get the credit for that one.

              However much is necessary to arrive at the truth.