markus99@lemmy.worldBanned to Linux@lemmy.ml · 2 years agoLinux hits 4% on the desktop 🐧 📈gs.statcounter.comexternal-linkmessage-square234linkfedilinkarrow-up1974arrow-down119cross-posted to: technology@lemmit.onlinelinux@programming.devtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.mllinux_gaming@lemmy.worldlinux_gaming@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.mllinuxfurs@pawb.sociallinux_gaming@lemmy.world
arrow-up1955arrow-down1external-linkLinux hits 4% on the desktop 🐧 📈gs.statcounter.commarkus99@lemmy.worldBanned to Linux@lemmy.ml · 2 years agomessage-square234linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmit.onlinelinux@programming.devtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.mllinux_gaming@lemmy.worldlinux_gaming@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.mllinux@lemmy.mllinuxfurs@pawb.sociallinux_gaming@lemmy.world
minus-squarePuddingFeeling907linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·2 years agoYeah linux runs on 30+ year old hardware
minus-squareTrainguyrom@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 years agoI think I saw somewhere that Windows still has scheduled bugs with high core count CPUs so you can legitimately get better performance from Linux because the scheduler has already been optimized for high core count servers
Yeah linux runs on 30+ year old hardware
And brand new $12k CPUs
I think I saw somewhere that Windows still has scheduled bugs with high core count CPUs so you can legitimately get better performance from Linux because the scheduler has already been optimized for high core count servers