Years in the making, the federal government is poised to introduce a new piece of legislation on Monday aimed at addressing a series of online harms.

  • Victor Villas
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    That wouldn’t make sense, but even if that was not a joke, it would be out of scope. The legislation is likely to focus on requiring platforms to moderate content more strongly; plus maybe penalties for cyberbullying, deepfakes and such.

    Being insensitive online is unlikely to ever become a crime, let alone something that can prosecuted retroactively.

    • Paragone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      There’s a law, possibly international/UN or something, against making laws that retroactively criminalize stuff, so you’re right, on that point.

      Pretending that such things won’t ever become a crime, however, when the US is at the point of criminalizing

      • miscarriage
      • some brain-wirings/genders
      • violating christofascist supremacism
      • not being a Trump-cult member

      as the next few years will demonstrate,

      is naive/incompetent.

      Yes, criminal-law is going to be used to enforce ideological-conforming, throughout much of the West, exactly as China, Israel, Russia, etc, now “use”/abuse law.

      That tipping-point has already been crossed, on this world.

      • Victor Villas
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        All your examples indicate that if anything, having an actual black face is riskier than doing blackface in the long term.