• wise_pancake
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Even if they do need to authenticate some digitalid, there’s no need to store it and there’s no reason for it to link to an individual person.

    This is a very dangerous idea as is.

    • platypus_plumba@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      And this won’t even stop kids from finding porn. I think it is based on good intentions but they are too proud to say “yeha, maybe this has more cons than pros”

      • Gabu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        It’s obviously not based on good intentions… how can you be this naïve? If a conservative says “but think of the children”, you know fully well whatever they’re proposing is not for the wellbeing of children.

        • Exocrinous@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          When a conservative says “think of the children”, what they mean is “think of the queer kids that will be outed to their parents and sent to conversion therapy”.

      • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Does anyone have a copy of Mike Johnson’s ID? His son is in for a lot of notifications.