• m-p{3}A
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    Yet they still need the ability to pay their rent to work where they’re needed.

    • yeather
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      10 months ago

      Yes, like in a less expensive area, where the wages they get would go a lot farther.

      • m-p{3}A
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        10 months ago

        So you end up with no Starbuck in LA.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          This person lives in the middle of nowhere to the extent that it’s surprising that they have internet access. This person has never been near a city of more than 100,000 people and just watches TV nonstop while complaining about how horrible people are who live in different places and in different ways.

          • yeather
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Currently in a city of ~330,000. Sitting comfortably and watching youtube.

            • stoly@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              City lol

              You’re not a city until you hit 1m. Until then you’re a large town with an inflated ego.

              • yeather
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                10 months ago

                “You’re not a city until you hit 1m.” So what you’re saying is there are only 9 cities in the entire United States? I think you have your definitions wrong, or you live in New York / Los Angeles and have no clue what most of the US is like.

                • stoly@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  Worse: there are really only three cities in the US: NYC, San Fran, and Chicago. They are the only ones that meet the definition that people around the world accept as being a city. The rest of the US is just large towns unless you’re going to argue that Omaha is like Paris somehow.

                  • yeather
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    There is in fact no generally agreed uppon definition of a city. Most people would call Boston a city, but it only has 675k people. Most people wouldn’t call Wells a city, but the British do. Most people would call London a city, but not the British. Generally, a city is a defined area with more density than surrounding areas over 100,000 people, and a significant other factor, be it cultural, administrative, or historical.

                    On your second point, the US has nine cities over the 1 million mark according to the 2020 census. New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Houston, Phoenix, San Diego, and Dallas. Boston is number 25 with 675k. Omaha is number 40.