No one was inside a Waymo car as it was destroyed.

A crowd destroyed a driverless Waymo car in San Francisco::A Waymo car was destroyed in San Francisco as a crowd began vandalizing it and ultimately set the car on fire. Nobody was in the vehicle at the time.

  • masterspaceEnglish
    14·
    10 months ago

    No. Not securing loads is the dangerous part.

    Jesus christ, you’re trying to argue that driving isn’t dangerous? Ok bud, glad to see you’re approaching this discussion in good faith /s

    There’s a reason you don’t see the likes of UPS or DHL get into automated cars, but venture capital moonshot tech companies promising nonsense on the one hand,

    Yeah, cause they literally started from DARPA’s moonshot program and take massive amounts of cutting edge machine learning to execute, not exactly DHL / UPS’ strong suit given that they contracted out development of almost all of their software until very recently.

    • barsoap@lemm.eeEnglish
      31·
      10 months ago

      Jesus christ, you’re trying to argue that driving isn’t dangerous?

      Professional drivers have a very, very low accident rate. And generally don’t tend to be at fault even if they get into one. Distracted commuters are where the accidents happen, people who should not be using roads but public transportation.

      not exactly DHL / UPS’ strong suit

      What part of “DHL manufactured cars themselves” did you not understand. They know exactly what they need from their vehicles and self-driving wasn’t on the list. Electric was on the list, specific range requirements were on the list, second front seat wasn’t, instead you have comfortable loading heights and well thought through access to the load (that includes the missing 2nd front seat). That’s the stuff that actually matters for a delivery van. Automated driving would only get into the way of the fancy manoeuvring the vans do.

      • masterspaceEnglish
        12·
        10 months ago

        Distracted commuters are where the accidents happen, people who should not be using roads but public transportation.

        Yeah, you’re right, there’s no point implementing any road safety standards or technology whatsoever because it would be better if we all just instantly switched to public transportation! Thank god we live in a world where it’s only ever worth it to pursue the most perfect and naïve solution! All we have to do is rework our entire transportation network and tear down existing houses and force the residents to all move into villages! What a perfect solution, totally feasible in the next 10 years.

        What part of “DHL manufactured cars themselves” did you not understand. They know exactly what they need from their vehicles and self-driving wasn’t on the list.

        Lol, DHL didn’t specify self driving because it wasn’t an available option, and they don’t have the technical capability to build, not because they wouldn’t want it. They have an entire page on their website stating explicitly that they are closely monitoring self driving technology as it stands to have a huge impact on their business.

        • barsoap@lemm.eeEnglish
          31·
          10 months ago

          Thank god we live in a world where it’s only ever worth it to pursue the most perfect and naïve solution!

          Like automated driving? Shit isn’t working, isn’t even close to working to the degree that advocates said it would ten years ago. Meanwhile, public transportation is a tried and true approach that actually fixes issues. It’s vastly more energy and resource efficient and does not create socio-economic barriers to mobility.

          They have an entire page on their website

          Yards make sense and that stuff actually is in operation in many places, it’s a controlled environment. You’ll be hard-pressed to find a modern container terminal without autonomous vehicles.

          Long haul does not make sense as that’s train territory. Which of course can also drive automated which, unlike self-driving cars, actually a mature technology. Drivers are still used long-haul though because there’s need to do non-driving tasks that AI can’t do, automated trains are a metro thing.

          Last-mile makes approximately zero sense. Parcel pickups are the right solution for standard service and for premium service AI generally won’t be capable enough for decades if not centuries to come. You don’t want a pharmacy to wait for life-saving medicine because someone put a traffic cone on the hood.

          • masterspaceEnglish
            13·
            10 months ago

            Like automated driving? Shit isn’t working, isn’t even close to working to the degree that advocates said it would ten years ago.

            It is working, Waymo is operating taxi services in two cities successfully, and yeah, it’s turned out to be a harder problem than initially realized, so were smartphones, now they’re everywhere. You know what’s a harder problem that will take longer than decades? Reorienting all of society around villages and public transportation and forcing people to move and abandon their cottages.

            Meanwhile, public transportation is a tried and true approach that actually fixes issues. It’s vastly more energy and resource efficient and does not create socio-economic barriers to mobility.

            No one’s arguing against public transportation. Stop trying to make it sound like this is a car vs. public transportation thing, when it’s people trashing autonomous cars and not other cars.

            Drivers are still used long-haul though because there’s need to do non-driving tasks that AI can’t do, automated trains are a metro thing.

            And because trains don’t get you to the last mile, roads do.

            You don’t want a pharmacy to wait for life-saving medicine because someone put a traffic cone on the hood.

            Again, you’d still have a delivery person for critical deliveries, they just wouldn’t be driving. If someone asshole wants to stop ambulance right now they can too.

            • barsoap@lemm.eeEnglish
              3·
              10 months ago

              ou know what’s a harder problem that will take longer than decades? Reorienting all of society around villages and public transportation and forcing people to move and abandon their cottages.

              It’s not that hard and no you don’t need to re-do the whole country to make a massive impact. Making a random US city walkable would take like five years max if you actually set your mind to it.

              No one’s arguing against public transportation. Stop trying to make it sound like this is a car vs. public transportation thing, when it’s people trashing autonomous cars and not other cars.

              Then why are you bringing up strawmen “but we need delivery vans” when I was specifically talking about individual transportation being bad? Ten cars getting replaced by a car share is good, one car getting replaced by one autonomous car is bullshit: It’s not self-driving that will address the systemic issues with transportation. Just as many cars on just as impassable roads won’t make them safer for pedestrians. I get being excited by a technology but it’s far from a silver bullet, on its own it addresses quite literally nothing of relevance.

              And because trains don’t get you to the last mile, roads do.

              As do collect taxis. Do I have to repeat that five times more.

              Again, you’d still have a delivery person for critical deliveries, they just wouldn’t be driving. Is someone asshole wants to stop ambulance right now they can too.

              If someone wants to stop an ambulance the driver will go around them, or go out and curse their ass off until they move, or right-out push their car out of the way (because yes with blue lights on you have the right to ram, over here, the offending driver will be sent a bill for the repair of the ambulance and face criminal charges). Good luck teaching an AI to make those calls.

              • masterspaceEnglish
                13·
                10 months ago

                It’s not that hard and no you don’t need to re-do the whole country to make a massive impact. Making a random US city walkable would take like five years max if you actually set your mind to it.

                And you’ll still have drivers, and it will still be safer if they were autonomous.

                one car getting replaced by one autonomous car is bullshit: It’s not self-driving that will address the systemic issues with transportation.

                So now every technology improvement needs to solve every single systemic problem or it’s not worth pursuing? That’s your argument? Autonomous vehicles don’t solve every transportation problem, they solve the problem of drivers regularly killing and maiming people.

                I get being excited by a technology but it’s far from a silver bullet, on its own it addresses quite literally nothing of relevance.

                Oh wow, the literal millions of road deaths every year are now “nothing of relevance”.

                As do collect taxis. Do I have to repeat that five times more.

                No they’re not. Not for the distances covered in many rural areas. Try and wrap your brain around the fact that not everywhere is Europe where there’s millions of people packed into a postage stamp.

                If someone wants to stop an ambulance the driver will go around them, or go out and curse their ass off until they move, or right-out push their car out of the way (because yes with blue lights on you have the right to ram, over here, the offending driver will be sent a bill for the repair of the ambulance and face criminal charges). Good luck teaching an AI to make those calls.

                You literally quote the answer to that:

                Again, you’d still have a delivery person for critical deliveries, they just wouldn’t be driving.